N.H. STATE REP. SUBMITS HOUSE BILL TO RETURN TO GOLD STANDARD

Nashua Telegraph reports: “State Rep. Norman Tregenza explains why he submitted a House bill that, if approved, would encourage the state’s federal delegation to work on getting the country back on the gold standard.”

“Tregenza’s bill would petition the U.S. Congress to correct what he says is a departure from the constitutional mandate that states use only gold and silver coins as legal tender and empowers the federal government only to coin money. The bill would also direct lawmakers to phase out the Federal Reserve System.”

A TIME LINE OF U.S. HISTORY AND HOW THE USURPATION HAPPENED!

B R E A K I N G . . .

This may give you some insight on how and why things got so crazy…

 Rod Class AIB Talkshoe Call Recording with Timeline #1 – Sat. Jan. 15, 2011
A Time Line Of U.S. History (and others) And How The Usurpation Happened!

Rod Class and Jeanette AIB Talkshoe Call Recording with Timeline #2 –    Wed. Jan. 26, 2011
A Time Line Of U.S. History (and others) And How The Usurpation Happened !

SECRET BANKER’S MANUAL

“This manual is for educational purposes only and not legal advice.”

WILL MAINE’S SEATBELT LAW TAKE A RIDE?

BDN reports that “Sen. Ron Collins R-Wells has introduced a bill, LD 64, that would make not wearing a seat belt no longer a primary offense. He is seeking to change a 3-year-old state law that allows police officers to stop and ticket motorists for failing to buckle up.” The bill “would revert Maine to the days when drivers and passengers could receive a ticket for failing to wear a seat belt only after police pulled the vehicle over for another offense. Maine lawmakers voted in the spring of 2007 to make failing to wear a seat belt a “primary offense” — the legal term for a violation that allows police to stop a vehicle, “fines ranging from $50 to $250.”

“Figures supplied by the Maine Department of Public Safety showed that the number of citations issued:”

“In 2007, officers issued 8,062 seat belt citations. That figure jumped to 18,273 in 2008, even though officers did not begin issuing tickets until April 1 of that year. The number of citations issued fell to 15,002 in 2009 and 12,654 in 2010, according to figures supplied by the Maine Bureau of Highway Safety.”

How did this “primary violation” law get past Constitutional review?

The current law is in place to generate revenue. Taxation by citation?

Senator Collins should be working to repeal the seat belt law completely, rather than just changing the status of not wearing a belt from a primary to a secondary offense. It’s a personal choice whether to buckle up or not.

“This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof;… shall be the supreme law of the land;….. The Senators and Representatives and members of the State legislature, and all executive and judicial officers of the United States and the several States, shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.” The Constitution of the united States of America, Article VI, Cl 2, 3.

All government officials and agencies, including all State legislatures, are bound by the Constitution and must not create any defacto laws which counter the Constitution. Any laws created by government which are repugnant to the Constitution carry no force of law and are void:

“The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void and ineffective for any purpose, since its unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment… In legal contemplation, it is as inoperative as if it had never been passed… Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no right, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection and justifies no acts performed under it… A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing law. Indeed insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it is superseded thereby. No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.” Bonnett v. Vallier, 116 N.W. 885, 136 Wis. 193 (1908); NORTON v. SHELBY COUNTY, 118 U.S. 425 (1886). See also Bonnett v Vallier, 136 Wis 193, 200; 116 NW 885, 887 (1908); State ex rel Ballard v Goodland, 159 Wis 393, 395; 150 NW 488, 489 (1915); State ex rel Kleist v Donald, 164 Wis 545, 552-553; 160 NW 1067, 1070 (1917); State ex rel Martin v Zimmerman, 233 Wis 16, 21; 288 NW 454, 457 (1939); State ex rel Commissioners of Public Lands v Anderson, 56 Wis 2d 666, 672; 203 NW2d 84, 87 (1973); and Butzlaffer v Van Der Geest & Sons, Inc, Wis, 115 Wis 2d 539; 340 NW2d 742, 744-745 (1983).

All statutes must be governed by rules and regulations. What are the rules and regulations that govern any seatbelt law? If lawmakers cannot provide the rules and regulations, any law passed will be null and void.

Bar Association History

Constitution of the united States with original 13th.

Has anyone researched the who and why of the “disappearance” of the 13th Amendment from the constitution?

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD MARCH 9, 1933, SEVENTY THIRD CONGRESS FIRST SESSION

Congressional Record March 9, 1933, Seventy Third Congress First Session. This document shows the fraud perpetrated through use of Federal Reserve Bank Notes.

You are invited by Rodney Dale: [Class] to join a live Community Call on AIB Radio. Rod and his national researchers will reveal the fraud committed by the passing of the Federal Reserve Act, The Bank Act and the Act of Oct 6 1917.

Scheduled Time:
Date: Fri, January 28, 2011
Time: 09:00 PM EST

How to participate:
Call in:
Dial: (724) 444-7444
Enter: 48361 # (Call ID)
Enter: 1 # or your PIN

Join from your computer:

Click here to join the call or just listen along

Rod says fasten your seatbelts……you’re in for a ride!

Could this document be the resolution to the problems this Nation faces?

CAFR1 – THE ONLY GAME IN TOWN!

‘We have seen Government’s Game, now it is Time that Government learned the People’s ….Only Game in Town!”

“This is a big Win – Win for all involved, and if implemented will create a thriving economy probably for the next thousand years in its own right. So please help pass the word worldwide to millions of people, this is not just for the USA but for all countries worldwide… Comprehension is the key to unlocking all doors and here it is, straight forward, clear, and to the point.”

Is it not time to truly take back ownership of our country? “Let’s make it happen and happen soon. Timing is everything and I think we all can agree, the time is now.”

Walter Burien – CAFR1.com
P. O. Box 2112
Saint Johns, AZ 85936

email: WalterBurien@CAFR1.com

Tel. (928) 445-3532

http://CAFR1.com and http://TaxRetirement.com

THE NEW HAMPSHIRE HOUSE RECONSTITUTES A REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES COMMITTEE

“The New Hampshire House has reconstituted a Redress of Grievances Committee to hear complaints from citizens, but exactly what does that mean? At the committee’s first meeting, Chairman Paul Ingbretson instructed members to look at the history of petitions, which are authorized by the state Constitution. From the time the Constitution was passed in 1784 through the mid-19th century, petitions were common.”  A little bit of history, Concord Monitor.

“As the new committee begins its work, it faces a task rarely performed in modern times.” Will repeating history, allowing people to come forward and “petition their representatives to take certain action” restore judicial and governmental accountability which is very much lacking at the present?

Can Maine legislators learn from this history lesson?

RIGHT TO WORK

“Maine Taxpayers United
Monday morning, January 17th, 2011
Good morning Ladies & Gentlemen,

At last Saturday’s meeting of the MTU Board, we heard a brief and effective presentation on Right to Work (RTW) legislation and issues by Mr. John Kalb of the New England Council for Right to Work. Maine is presently a forced-union state, which means that many employees, including those in government positions, may be forced to pay union dues which are then used by union bosses to influence elections and actions in the legislature which are contrary to their interests.

“To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.” Thomas Jefferson

Right to Work states allow workers to participate in unions, if they wish to do so, but unions cannot require anyone to join or pay dues. These states enjoy more economic activity and higher standards of living than those who live and work in forced-union states. Here are some links for your perusal:

Forced-Unionism in our USA: http://www.nrtw.org/en/rtws.htm National Institute for Labor Relations Research: http://nilrr.org/node/104

Our two MTU lady legislators – Senator Lois Snowe-Mello and Representative Beth O’Connor – have submitted and are sponsoring a bill which make Maine a RTW state. This Bill – An Act to Prohibit Forced Payment of Labor Union Dues or Fees by workers – has not received a number yet, but will be heard by the Labor, Commerce, Research and Economic Committee of the Legislature. Senator Snowe-Mello reports that not all Republicans on this committee are enthusiastic about this bill. Here are the members:

Sen.Christopher Rector (R-Knox), Chair Sen.Thomas Martin (R-Kennebec) Sen.Troy Jackson (D-Aroostook) Rep. Kerri Prescott (R-Topsham), Chair

Rep.Dana Dow (R-Waldboro) Rep. Melvin Newendyke (R-Litchfield) Rep. Amy Fern Volk (R-Scarborough) Rep. Frederick Wintle (R-Garland)

Rep.John Tuttle (D-Sanford) Rep.Timothy Driscoll (D-Westbrook) Rep. Paul Gilbert (D-Jay) Rep.Robert Hunt (D-Buxton) Rep.Erin Herbig (D-Belfast)

Lois and Beth have met with Governor LePage, and he is supporting 100%. But we can expect a Battle Royale starting when the bill reaches the above committee. The opposition will be lead by the Maine AFL-CIO, “A Union of Unions Fighting For Working Families In Maine”. Now do you believe that? The AFL-CIO would have us believe that they cannot offer two different memberships: one that would defray negotiating expenses, and another that would in addition include political activity.

The MTU Board voted unanimously Saturday to support this bill and make Maine a Right to Work State. This is in accordance with Our Mission, which is to reduce the tax burden and promote prudent government spending. Forced unionism drives up costs, particularly in the case of government spending, and inhibits job creation thus hurting us economically.

We are asking all in this network to become active in supporting this legislation by contacting their senator and representative and urging them to support.

And finally, the most important battle will be in the above committee, so if your senator or representative is on this committee, please contact them soon and tell them that you expect them to get on board. And that which be even better would be to get your friends to do the same.

Please let me know what you think and can do, and I’ll send your thoughts on to the Board. Widest dissemination, please and thank you.”

Jack Wibby,
Communications Director
jwibby@maine.rr.com

ARE THE COURTS “CRYING WOLF?”

PPH reports “Court system cash strapped, says chief justice.” Maine Supreme Judicial Court Chief Justice Leigh Saufley’s Tuesday (1-19-11) meeting with members of the Legislature’s Judiciary Committee provided an overview of Maine’s court system. “We are doing very well given the limited budget that we have at this point,” Saufley said. “But we are struggling, there’s no question about that.” “Forty-one clerks’ offices have been reduced to 26, two courthouses have recently been closed, four more have been consolidated into two, with more consolidations scheduled in the next three years, Saufley said.”

The NH Concord Monitor reports  “NH chief justice proposes new mega-court.” “New Hampshire court officials said Wednesday that combining three courts into one will better serve the public while saving $37 million over 10 years.”

“The plan to combine the state’s probate, family and district courts into a new Circuit Court was the centerpiece of a report submitted to the state Supreme Court by the Judicial Innovation Commission. The group, which included judicial branch workers, lawmakers and businesspeople, was appointed in March to analyze how to cut costs and streamline court operations at time when courts face both growing demand for services and shrinking funding. Under the plan, the state’s 78 courts in 40 locations would remain open, but management and staff would be shared. In 2009, Gov. John Lynch proposed closing some courts and consolidating others to save money but the Legislature rejected the idea.”

Are the courts really “cash strapped?”  The months of research on the evidence below are serious points to ponder:

Court docket numbers are assigned a CUSIP number, securitized and traded for profit. “Each case has its own account! And the clerk is the “custodian of the account!” Gives new meaning to the phrase “the business of the court!”

The Court Registry Investment System (CRIS) is a cash management system used by the Judiciary. (see p. 41) The CRIS report shows how the courts invest and financially benefit from court cases. (This is a large file. It may take up to 5 minutes to download but it is totally worth the wait.)

CUSIP stands for Committee on Uniform Securities Identification Procedures. A CUSIP number identifies most securities, including: stocks of all registered U.S. and Canadian companies, and U.S. government and municipal bonds. The CUSIP system—owned by the American Bankers Association and operated by Standard & Poor’s—facilitates the clearing and settlement process of securities.

The number consists of nine characters (including letters and numbers) that uniquely identify a company or issuer and the type of security. A similar system is used to identify foreign securities (CUSIP International Numbering System).

Court cases are issued a CUSIP number. To find the CUSIP No. and Bonds by the CUSIP No. Click here.

US District Court Local Rules   

 67.2 Deposit of Registry Funds Into Interest-Bearing Account

Connect the dots.

Securitization is illegal

Beware Metro And Regional Government!

View more related documents at http://www.tiny.cc/landfarm and http://landrightsnfarming-landrightnfarming.blogspot.com/

Do we have more than just a conflict of interest here? Are the courts “crying wolf?”

I attended a hearing in Bath, Maine awhile back. Most cases involved traffic violations. The accused were hurdled in like cattle. From 9:00 a.m. to noontime, approximately $30,000 in fines were agreed upon by the victims. The same line was spoken by the judge “how much can you pay today?” This is only ONE court in Maine. Where does this money go? Is it not time for an audit of the Maine courts?

FORMER FBI CHIEF, TED L. GUNDERSON’S STATEMENT REGARDING THE CHEMTRAIL “DEATH DUMPS”

 

Former FBI Chief Ted Gunderson Says Chemtrail Death Dumps Must Be Stopped.

 

“WHAT IS WRONG WITH CONGRESS? This has an affect on their population, and their people, and their friends, and their relatives, and themselves. What’s wrong with them? What’s wrong with the pilots who are flying these airplanes and dumping this crap, this poison, on their own families? Somebody has to do something about it. Somebody in Congress has to step forward and stop it now. Thank you. I’m Ted Gunderson.”

 

I doubt this video will be online much longer, so watch it while you can and PASS ALONG TO FRIENDS & FAMILY.

Anyone in the country can now e-mail House Speaker John Boehner.

After former Speaker Nancy Pelosi passed Boehner the gavel, his office launched SpeakerBoehner@mail.house.gov to allow voters to easily contact him.

Members of Congress have long accepted e-mail from their constituents through web forms, but they’ve typically blocked people from outside their districts or states from writing.

Boehner’s new media director Nick Schaper said having a general address makes it easy for citizens to contact the Speaker online.

“It’s our goal to make sure we’re tracking every touch we have with citizens — calls, letters, emails — in a way that allows us to keep them informed on the issues they care about,” Schaper told Congress.org in an e-mail.”

Schaper said the GOP has taken “full advantage” of the web in recent years, and added that citizens will “now see that enthusiasm translated into more effective governing.”

Wouldn’t this be a good place to start and let him take this serious concern before the House?