The Country’s Loss Of A True Patriot…David Dodge, Researcher 13th Amendment

David Dodge
2-3-17
RIP

It is with great sadness to report the passing of a true patriot, David Dodge. David passed away on Friday, February 3, 2017.

In 1983, researchers David Dodge and Tom Dunn, while investigating governmental issues, came across a copy of the Constitution of the United States published in 1825. They were astounded to find the original 13th Amendment.

“His work will be long remembered as will his place with our efforts.” Dick Marple

 

Evidence of historical scandal found at Belfast library, OCTOBER 17. 1991

Missing 13th Amendment -Interview with David Dodge, Researcher Nov 2012, Click HERE.

Talkshoe Radio With Guest David Dodge, Researcher – The “Missing” Original 13th Amendment, click HERE.

Talkshoe Radio With Guests David Dodge And Brian March, Researchers – The “Missing” Original 13th Amendment, click HERE.

Published in: on February 5, 2017 at 11:59 am  Comments (3)  

The Manipulation And Lying Regarding The Original 13th Amendment

Courtesy of Lise from Maine

Take notice of the some of the things mentioned in these documents, click here.

The first thing to understand is the title of Vol. II which says “Documentary History of the Constitution of the United States of America.” The year is 1894 which is 29 years after the civil war which changed everything over time.

This is incorrect.

It is called the Constitution of the United States.

Is this the “new” District of Columbia government established in 1871?

Take notice where it says “city of Washington and not Washington, District of Columbia.

The next thing to pay attention to is that the Governors of the several States of the Union are called “His Excellency.”

Why is that?

Because the States of the Union were the most powerful as opposed to the general government so, therefore, the leader of each State had this title. He was highly respected, and NOT a servant of the general government.

Additionally, the Secretary of State and so forth signed off as “Your Obedient Servant,” etc. He knew that he was a servant and not a master over the people.

Not so today. Government officials believe that they are masters over the people and they act as such.

Furthermore, pay strict attention to the actual body of the original 13th amendment as it pertains to spelling and punctuation. No one is allowed to change what Congress passed in order for the states to vote on something. It must be voted on “as is.” No changes allowed by the States.

Also, there are three (3) different 13th amendments in the volume. This volume makes it appear that the original one was never passed which is not true. Virginia was the last state to pass it but Virginia’s documents are not in the said volume.

Why is that?

In order to manipulate and lie to the American people that it didn’t pass.

Lastly, pay attention that the Great Seal was in “wax.”

Examine the documents yourself and learn from them.

Published in: on January 4, 2015 at 1:04 pm  Comments (1)  

Talkshoe Radio With Guests David Dodge And Brian March, Researchers – The “Missing” Original 13th Amendment

Wednesday, December 3, 2014
9:00 PM EDT

Call in Number: (724) 444-7444
Call ID: 27398#

Click here to join in online.

12/03/2014-EPISODE 44, listen here.

Related: Talkshoe Radio With Guest David Dodge, Researcher – The “Missing” Original 13th Amendmentclick here.

Original Constitution of the United States with ORIGINAL THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT As Ratified and Published by the State of Virginia (1819), click here or here.

The missing 13th Amendment, called Article XIII, reads:
“If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain, any title of nobility or honor, or shall, without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.”

Current  Constitution of the United States (1865) with Article XIII, click here. It reads:

1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

American State Papers – 1834 -Titles of Nobility, click here.

Published in: on November 29, 2014 at 8:27 pm  Leave a Comment  

Talkshoe Radio With Guest David Dodge, Researcher – The “Missing” Original 13th Amendment

Wednesday, November 12, 2014
9:00 PM EDT

Call in Number: (724) 444-7444
Call ID: 27398#

Click here to join in online.

Evidence of historical scandal found at Belfast (Maine) library.

In 1983, researchers David Dodge and Tom Dunn, while investigating governmental issues, came across a copy of the Constitution of the United States published in 1825. They were astounded to find the original 13th Amendment.

Join us with our special guest, David Dodge.

11/12/2014 08:30 PM EST-EPISODE 42, listen here.

CONSTITUTION OF MAINE (1825) ART. XIII, click here.

The Constitution of the United States, click here.

Published in: on November 6, 2014 at 9:37 pm  Comments (1)  

Here Is What The “Original” 13th Amendment Says

By Lise from Maine

“If any citizen of the United States (citizen of the several states) shall accept, claim, receive or retain any title of nobility
or honor, or shall, without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any
kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United
States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them (them = plural = all states), or either of
them (them = plural = all states).”

Understand what this actually means.

Does it say anything about esquires?

NO!

Read it again and again and again. Understand the English language (French was my first language) and don’t take people’s
word for anything.

Study it yourself.

I did.

It means that “any” person (not just esquires – some esquires don’t operate from a public office) who holds a title of honor or nobility (has a public office) and “accepts and retains” any pension, office, or emolument of “any” kind “from anyone” who has “power” such as a king, emperor, prince, etc without the consent of Congress (such as a lovely gift, for ex. a beautiful vase, etc of some kind that has value in it – Congress is not allowed to participate in fraud either) will no longer be able to hold any “public” office again and is a person “without a country (states are nations, country – see Bouvier’s Law Dictionary).”

In other words, this is about NOT taking bribes from foreigners, who has power, in order to avoid “influence” from their “public” office and provide these foreigners with what they desire.

It has NOTHING to do with just plain esquires.

It has everything to do with those, who hold a title of honor and operates from a public office, who can be influenced by taking bribes from certain foreigners, who have a great deal of power and influence, and get them what they want.

If someone doesn’t understand what they are reading and their premise is wrong such as applying to esquires ONLY as above-noted, then the conclusion is wrong, too (I took many philosophy courses in college).

Now do you understand WHY I keep HARPING on studying words, phrases, sentences, and paragraphs and how they are each connected to each other and how they are used?

After over 6 years of studying the laws of Maine and discovering fraud all over the place and challenging authority figures, I am used to their trickery over time.

As a matter of fact, I NOW expect it but can see through it clearly.

Words are very important.

Lastly, the “original” 13th amendment has NOTHING to do with just plain esquires with NO public office.

Nothing at all.

I have in my possession an 1825 book (cover is made of wood) that I found in Hallowell, Maine (antique bookstore) that contains the “original” 13th amendment, and it took me two (2) years to find it.

I was aware of this amendment for years and began my search for it in some antique bookstores and was rewarded over time be continuing to look for it.

I finally found it.

I welcome questions.

*****

Original Constitution of the United States with the 13 Amendments to the Constitution, click here.

Related: Missing 13th Amendment -Interview with David Dodge, Researcher Nov 2012, click here.

Thirteenth Amendment – Titles of Nobility, click here.

Published in: on September 15, 2013 at 11:30 am  Comments (12)  

Missing 13th Amendment -Interview with David Dodge, Researcher Nov 2012

View Video, click here.

“TITLES OF NOBILITY” AND “HONOR”

In the winter of 1983, archival research expert David Dodge, and former Baltimore police investigator Tom Dunn, were searching for evidence of government corruption in public records stored in the Belfast Library on the coast of Maine. By chance, they discovered the library’s oldest authentic copy of the Constitution of the United States (printed in 1825). Both men were stunned to see this document included a 13th Amendment that no longer appears on current copies of the Constitution.

Moreover, after studying the Amendment’s language and historical context, they realized the principle intent of this “missing” 13th Amendment was to prohibit lawyers from serving in government. So began a seven year, nationwide search for the truth surrounding the most bizarre Constitutional puzzle in American history — the unlawful removal of a ratified Amendment from the Constitution of the United States. Since 1983, Dodge and Dunn have uncovered additional copies of the Constitution with the “missing” 13th Amendment printed in at least eighteen separate publications by ten different states and territories over four decades from 1822 to 1860. In June of this year (1991), Dodge uncovered the evidence that this missing 13th Amendment had indeed been lawfully ratified by the state of Virginia and was therefore an authentic Amendment to the American Constitution. If the evidence is correct and no logical errors have been made, a 13th Amendment restricting lawyers from serving in government was ratified in 1819 and removed from our Constitution during the tumult of the Civil War. Since the Amendment was never lawfully repealed, it is still the Law today. The implications are enormous. The story of this “missing” Amendment is complex and at times confusing because the political issues and vocabulary of the American Revolution were different from our own. However, there are essentially two issues: What does the Amendment mean? Was the Amendment ratified?

Before we consider the issue of ratification, we should first understand the Amendment’s meaning and consequent current relevance. MEANING of the 13th Amendment The “missing” 13th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States reads as follows:

The Missing 13th Amendment Page 1 of 11 http://www.trosch.org/law/13th-amendment.html 2/28/2012 “If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.”

At the first reading, the meaning of this 13th Amendment (also called the “title of nobility” Amendment) seems obscure, unimportant. The references to “nobility”, “honour”, “emperor”, “king”, and “prince” lead us to dismiss this amendment as a petty postrevolution act of spite directed against the British monarchy. But in our modern world of Lady Di and Prince Charles, anti-royalist sentiments seem so archaic and quaint, that the Amendment can be ignored. Not so. Consider some evidence of its historical significance: First, “titles of nobility” were prohibited in both Article VI of the Articles of Confederation (1777) and in Article I, Sections 9 and 10 of the Constitution of the United States (1787); Second, although already prohibited by the Constitution, an additional “title of nobility” amendment was proposed in 1789, again in 1810, and according to Dodge, finally ratified in 1819.

Clearly, the founding fathers saw such a serious threat in “titles of nobility” and “honors” that anyone receiving them would forfeit their citizenship. Since the government prohibited “titles of nobility” several times over four decades, and went through the amending process (even though “titles of nobility” were already prohibited by the Constitution), it’s obvious that the Amendment carried much more significance for our founding fathers than is readily apparent today. -Adask

Evidence of historical scandal found at Belfast library, OCTOBER 17. 1991

Published in: on December 25, 2012 at 6:22 pm  Comments (1)  
%d bloggers like this: