View – TrumpTheEstablishment
“Brexit campaign leader Nigel Farage breaks down the dire importance of America’s upcoming presidential election.”
View interview HERE.
We must look at the big picture!
Both Trump and Christie have released tirades against each other and that neither were qualified for the presidendency.
Newsmax Wires reported “Christie Hits Trump: Country Needs ‘Grown Up’, Not ‘Carnival Barker, Entertainer-in-Chief’ with Christie describing him as a one of the “carnival barkers of today” and declaring “showtime is over.” “We are not electing an entertainer-in-chief. Showmanship is fun, but it is not the kind of leadership that will truly change America.”
States Donald Trump “It’s ridiculous to back Chris,” pointing out New Jersey’s “through the roof” tax rates, nine credit downgrades and the George Washington Bridge closure scandal. Christie can’t win because of his past.”
Christie should spend more time looking after things in his own backyard.
“You know, the people of New Jersey want to throw him out of office,” Trump said.
NJ Advance Media reported on Trumps’ “Bashing of Christie’s Economic Record.” “Trump said New Jersey is “a disaster” in terms of its economy. He “told the crowd that the state’s taxes “are through the roof.”
CNBC reported “Christie: Trump would hurt presidential credibility.” “For Christie, it’s an example of Trump’s penchant for drawing attention with gaudy promises that can’t be fulfilled. Another one: Trump’s “great line” about building a wall at the U.S.-Mexico border and somehow forcing Mexico to pay for it. When you do that, it hurts the credibility of the presidency.” Christie “went on to say that some of Trump’s money-making skills in business aren’t transferable to government, since presidents cannot simply roll over political adversaries by saying “You’re fired.” States Christie “I don’t think it would be in the best interests of our party to have someone I don’t think would be an effective president as the nominee.”
The economy and building “the wall” are just two of Donald’s Trumps platform issues…Christie and Trump are definitely NOT on the same page!
Is the circus coming to town? Has showtime just begun? Will this be a circus made in heaven?
Why would Donald Trump choose “more of the same?”
Related: Is There More Behind New Hampshire Corruption? Click here.
Mike Gill Sr. Exposes the Corruption Circle, click here.
Courtesy of Charlotte Iserbyt
This is so timely and relevant to current news re Donald Trump meeting with Henry Kissinger.
This article, “KISSINGER OUT OF THE CLOSET” is written for the edification of Mr. Donald Trump, candidate for President of the USA, who met with Mr. Henry Kissinger recently.
The following text has been taken from an article in the Washington Times, 12/08/02 entitled “Can Kissinger be Trusted?”
(As a footnote to this article, this writer met with Mr. Glagolev, defector from the Soviet Union, at a small dinner in his honor, hosted by the Maine Conservative Union, in Portland, Maine, prior to his (Glagolev’s) appearance at a conference held by Maine’s Chamber of Commerce, at which Asst. Defense Secretary Warnke spoke in regard to U.S. defense superiority vis-a-via the Soviet Union. I was involved in inviting Mr. Glagolev to present his views on this subject., ie. that the Soviet Union military capabilities were , in fact, superior to those of the United States. Mr. Glagolev’s comments at this small dinner were identical to the views expressed in the quote included in the Washington Inquirer article.
In an article titled “Who Surrendered Vietnam” (Washington Inquirer, Feb. 12, 1982), Igor S. Glagolev, wrote of a secret trip Mr. Kissinger made to the Soviet Union in December 1967. Mr. Glagolev, a defector from the Soviet Union, was identified in the article and in the March 1982 issue of Air Force magazine as a former Soviet arms control expert and part-time adviser on foreign policy to Politburo member V.V. Grishin.
In his article, Mr. Glagolev stated that in 1967, prior to the Kissinger visit, he had been asked to present a policy paper to the Politburo regarding continued support for the North Vietnamese war effort. His paper, which was discussed in the Politburo, advised that, because N. Vietnam was losing the military conflict, the Soviet Union should cut aid to the Ho Chi Minh regime. He contended “There was no doubt in the minds of the Soviet generals and admirals, including my assistants, that the communists were losing the military war in Vietnam. North Vietnam was half destroyed, and it could be fully destroyed in a short time.”
As Glagolev put it: “Such a reduction in the crucial Soviet aid would stop the communist offensive. It meant that South Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos would remain free.”
Unfortunately, the new KGB chairman, Yuri Andropov, had other ideas. He knew that, while U.S. military leaders were advocating continued resistance to a communist takeover in South Vietnam, influential voices in the media and the Johnson administration were pushing for a bombing halt and withdrawal of America troops. Among these was Henry Kissinger.
Did Mr. Kissinger go on record to the American people with his views, resigning his position in the government if necessary? No. Instead he made a secret trip to Moscow in December 1967 and made a confidential speech in the Moscow “House of Scholars” before G. Arbatov, director of the Institute for the USA and Canada, representatives of other Soviet agencies, including the KGB and Mr. Glagolev. In his speech, Mr. Kissinger implied the United States would stop the war in Vietnam unilaterally. In so doing, he gave Andropov just the ammunition he needed to support his position of continued aid to North Vietnam.
A sidebar accompanying the Times articles cites as a career highlight Mr. Kissinger’s 1973 Nobel Peace Prize for “efforts to negotiate a peaceful end to the Vietnam War,” a testimony to his duplicity and personal ambition above all else. His “peace efforts included agreeing to overlook 140,000 North Vietnamese regular army forces still in South Vietnam and his willingness to leave more than 2,000 U.S. prisoners of war and servicemen missing in action (MIA’s) in North Vietnam, most of whom are still unaccounted for. His Nobel Peace Price was gained at the expense of the lives of those servicemen and the betrayal of our South Vietnamese ally.”
Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt
Former Senior Policy Advisor
U.S. Department of Education
U.S. Department of Education
Related: Wife of jailed Vietnamese human rights activist comes to U.S. with a plea, click here.
Charlotte Iserbyt On Heritage Foundation’s Gingrich For Trump VP, click here.
By Charlotte Iserbyt
Remember – The Heritage Foundation drafted the North American Free Trade Agreement – NAFTA – which Trump says he opposes…?
Newsmax reports that Newt Gingrich is at the top of Donald Trump’s list for the VP nomination. Per John Gizzi:
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich is now the leading candidate to be tapped by Donald Trump as his running mate, a close confidante of Trump tells Newsmax.
EDWIN J. FEULNER, PhD
Just as Ronald Reagan made conservative ideas popular at the presidential level, so too did Newt Gingrich popularize them for the Congress and for a change in the Congress. In introducing Newt Gingrich again to a Heritage audience, I would only make three points.
The first point: When he was named Man of the Year by Time magazine in 1995, they said “Leaders make things possible; exceptional leaders make them inevitable.” Newt Gingrich belongs to the category of exceptional. Time magazine got it right that time.
Number two: Newt Gingrich is a man of vision and forward thinking. Several of us here in the room remember a brown bag lunch we had with him in 1978, before he was elected to Congress, while he was still a professor of history. It was over at our old headquarters building, and he talked to us about his vision of a future where stay-at-home moms–a term none of us had ever heard before at that point–would be working from computer terminals in their home. This before the invention of the Apple PC: a man of vision.
The voices now jumping on board to advise Trump whom to choose as VP running mate, are suggesting names…especially the high profile name of Newt Gingrich.
Newt Gingrich as a VP choice is the surest way to “deep six” the Trump Presidential Campaign. If Trump can’t be stopped in the primary process, bad advice by the “phony right” appears to be underway for the general election.
How can the phony right be identified at this juncture? By their advice to the Trump Campaign ye shall know them.
Read more HERE.
Gingrich open to being Trump’s GOP running mate, click here.
Heaven help us!
Gingrich also suggested Sunday that his decision would be based largely on what duties Trump would expect from a vice president and whether Trump indeed considers the job as “serious.”
Think about what THAT means.
To order the updated abridged 2011 version of The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America click this AMAZON ORDER LINK
New Hampshire Governor Maggie Hassan’s Campaign For U.S. Senator Uses Stephen Colbert’s Mockery of Kelly Ayotte’s “Support” But Not Endorsement of Donald Trump
Maggie Hassan’s Facebook page quote “ICYMI: The mockery of Ayotte’s “support, but not endorse” position on Trump is not getting any better” includes Stephen Colbert Open Mockery of Kelly Ayotte’s Position: “She’s in Some Sort of Political Quantum State. It’s like Schrodinger’s Cat.” Read more HERE.
Governor Hassan “mocks” (now former AG) US Senator Kelly Ayotte’s “support” of Donald Trump, yet Hassan continues to shield the official corruption/cover ups left behind by Kelly Ayotte.
Letter to Governor Maggie Hassan, click here.
Hassan DID NOTHING!
Neither can be trusted!
Letter to A.G. Joseph Foster, intercepted by Richard Head, click here.
Related: FARMINGTON N.H. POLICE CHIEF SCOTT ROBERGE RETIRING, click here.
Is There More Behind New Hampshire Corruption? Click here.
BEWARE OF WOLVES IN SHEEP’S CLOTHING!
By Kelleigh Nelson
October 27, 2015
“Wake up, it’s our last chance to save America. Please, make this article to go VIRAL.
After the insiders have established the United Socialist States of America (in fact if not in name), the next step is the Great Merger of all nations of the world into a dictatorial world government. … The Insiders’ code word for the world superstate is “new world order,” a phrase often used by Richard Nixon (and Bush Sr.). The Council on Foreign Relations states in its Study No. 7: “The U.S. must strive to: A. BUILD A NEW INTERNATIONAL ORDER.” … A world government has always been the object of the Communists. Gary Allen American journalist 1936-86, Source, None Dare Call It Conspiracy, p.121
Just why does the GOP hate Donald Trump? That’s easy to answer, because he’s thrown a monkey-wrench into the plans of the New World Order. (To understand the NWO, read Dr. Dennis Cuddy’s chronology of same.) Who would have thought that an outsider, like billionaire Donald Trump, would capture the attention of the American people, and at the same time, infuriate the GOP, DNC, and MSM, but mostly his own party! To the GOP, Donald Trump is not only a pariah, but a wild card. Americans who are sick and tired of the same old, same old from the Republican party are thrilled to hear someone speak the same language we speak to each other.
What is it that Trump stands for that makes the GOP so desirous of destroying him? It’s the opposite of what the New World Order gang wants!
Club For Growth’s War Against Trump
The poll that placed Trump in second place in Iowa was a fake, paid for by the notorious Club For Growth Action (CFG) and differs from the NBC News/WSJ/Marist poll over the weekend that has Trump in first place in Iowa by five points.
Remember that CFG asked for a million dollar donation from Trump, and he refused. From that point on, CFG was after Trump. CFG’s partners and allies include the Peter G. Peterson Foundation. Peterson is chairman emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations and former chairman of the New York Federal Reserve Bank. Another ally is the US Chamber of Commerce, who is so behind the invasion of illegal aliens on our southern borders.
CFG has spent a million dollars on anti-Trump ads in Iowa claiming Trump loves eminent domain and takes peoples’ property for his own use. The only problem with this is that the Iowa Christians listen to this rubbish and actually believe it. (Believing lies without doing your own research, is precisely why Obama got elected) The real facts are far from what CFG would have us believe. In 1986 Trump helped save Annabel Hill’s farm that had been in the family for five generations. “We give a lot of money to foreign countries that don’t give a damn about us, but we don’t help the American farmers,” Trump said.”
Read more HERE.