[new post] Rod Class’ Filing in the NC OAH – Objection of Motion To Dismiss from Asst. Atty. General David D. Lennon

This is a rather long explanation of Rod Class’ latest filing (7.25.12) into his case, 12 REV 05184,
before the NC Office Of Administrative Hearings (OAH).

Rod filed in, by mail, four documents Objecting to NC Asst. Atty. General David D. Lennon’s Motion To Dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction. Three of the documents are new Rod Class documents. The fourth is a cover letter to the Clerk of Court which we should always include when filing in court documents.

New Document #1 is Rod’s 21 page Objection to Lennon and also a Notice of Petitioner’s (Rod’s) Congressional Authority to claim himself as a Private Attorney General. All the info on the authority for being a PAG is in it. If you’re a budding PAG this should help you get on track. But, remember, being a PAG is NOT for the faint of heart OR the non-experienced courtroom litigator. The court is a scary place, at first, and takes some getting used to before you can effectively function within it ! So, be aware! And, always remember: You need to be able to walk and talk and understand Rod’s paperwork and strategy OR you’ll get eaten alive! ALL ROD’S PAPERWORK IS USED AT YOUR OWN RISK!

New Document #2 is Rod’s 16 page Declaration Of Status which, again, clearly outlines his authority to be a PAG, but it also includes Rod’s status as a “living” man and not a “dead” entity which the court always uses as a fallback to run over us with! Some of you may be able to use this (with modification) and some may not…it all depends on your case, circumstance and level of experience.

New Document #3 is a shorter version of a “living” status document that can be used if you have a court controversy or not. Use it along with your filings into a case right at the beginning to put the court, the prosecutor and any claimants against you on Notice! Some people may want to try to use it (send it to) with local, state and national officials to officially put them on Notice as to your status in relationship to them! Unfortunately, Rod used a version that wasn’t corrected for grammar or clarity, etc., so the document posted is the latest “final corrected version” with INSTRUCTIONS for use. We thought it would be better to post this template version so you would, at least, have something to work with. The document is to be hand written! The living are able to write, the dead are Not!

The 4th document is just the cover letter for the other 3 documents that Rod filed in to the court on July 25, 2012.

Will the court act on Rod’s Objection to Lennon’s Motion To Dismiss ? Who knows ? But at least, all the documents “should” be part of the record and “on file” in the case. Rod may have to take this case further up the line, as they say, but all his previous filings into the case “should,” now, “be part of the the record” for a higher court to take into consideration. The next stop for this case may have to be the NC State Supreme Court! Remember, we are trying to affect change “within the system” with their own black ink “law’, our pen, AND OUR BRAIN – And, NOT the other alternative! Wish Rod and the AIB Team success in this endeavor! Enjoy and Thank you!

Document#1  7.25.12_Rod_Class_NC_OAH_Objection_To_Lennon_Motion_To_Dismiss_Final _corrected

Document #2  7.25.12 Declaration Of Status

Document #3  6.14.12_Affidavit_Of_Status

Document #4  Rod_cover_letter_for_7.25.12 Filing

[new post] NC Asst. Atty. Gen. Lennon’s OAH Response (7.16.12) to Rod Class’ recent Petition

From Rod,

Here’s the North Carolina Asst. Atty. Gen. David Lennon’s response to Rod Class’ most recent Petition to the NC Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) in the Traffic / tax issue.

This is NOT an order from the Court – It is a Motion To Dismiss Rod’s case by the STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA from Mr. Lennon with his Exhibits which he thinks can only strengthen his argument. But, are these Exhibits merely “opinions” of two Judges ? We all know what opinions are worth, right ? Besides, the Court nor Mr. Lennon has seen what Rod has in mind for a rebuttal !

Mr. Lennon is acting on behalf of the actual North Carolina Attorney General, ROY COOPER, as he (Lennon) signed under Mr. Cooper’s name. And, Mr. Lennon has even built upon the first two descriptions of the State of North Carolina employees which called an obvious government employee a “private entity” (in Exhibit A by Judge May), then in Exhibit B, Exhibit A was confirmed. Note the two pages of Exhibit B didn’t describe the employee as a “private entity”…but, the description of “private contractor” was in either part of Judge May’s original ruling or in Judge Manning’s full and very rambling communication of recusal directly to Rod from last summer. It was a bizarre and comical communication to say the least. There’s a link below.

Now Mr. Lennon has added another descriptive phrase to the typical (what we think as a) North Carolina “government” employee of an “individual and not an agency of North Carolina, nor an employee of the State of North Carolina” on page 3 for Mr. Sisk, and for Ms. Millsaps on page 2. Lennon even says on page 3 that Ms. Millsaps is “not a trustee (public or otherwise ?) for any county or for the State of North Carolina…” So, both these people (Sisk and Millsaps) have what kind of relationship with the State of North Carolina or the county of Gaston ? ? ? Where do their paychecks come from ? Etc., etc. So many questions, so few answers and so much subterfuge!

Rod is working on his response to Mr. Lennon.

Here’s the link to Lennon’s 17 page Motion To Dismiss.

Judge Manning’s rambling letter to Rod, Summer of 2011.

[new post] Rod Class’ Latest Filings With the NC Office of Administrative Hearings RE: Traffic & Taxes

These three latest filings for Rod Class have grown out of a simple traffic stop back in October of 2010.

Rod is not a “right to travel” fighter in particular, but the incident in 2010 set the stage for his latest strategies and now involves not only the letter of the law as far as traffic laws are concerned, but now involves the collection of taxes and the Federally Mandated Acts that call for a portion of Federal Funds to be split with the local subdivisions (cities and towns) and the counties of North Carolina, AND is applicable in every other state in the union.

Back in 2010 when Rod appealed his traffic stop he took his issue into the local county “administrative” courts for a ruling. The local admin appeal court made a ruling that the court had no jurisdiction because the NC Department of Transportation and the local Tag Agency (license plates) were NOT “public officials” but supposedly “independent contractors / private entities”. Rod said, “OK, if that’s true, why are they collecting taxes and collecting licensing fees if they’re NOT part of the State ?” A good question, indeed, and herein lies the overarching questions. Rod and the rest of us want the answers ! And this is what’s at issue with these three recent filings into the high muckety-muck Office Of Administrative Hearings in the State capital of Raleigh.

1st document: Rod’s original June filing (42 pages) into the OAH in Raleigh.

After Rod filed this he got a communication from the Court asking Rod to put together a detaiied Pre-Hearing Statement that would go to the Defendants (and the OAH Court, of course) for their reaction and rebuttal, hopefully. This also served the function of informing the Defendants AND the Court of their non-procedural actions and the conflicting questions of law. Among other questions:
Are the DOT and the local Police Departments “public officials” or NOT !

Here’s Rod’s (21 page) Pre-Hearing Statement (2nd document).

Now, ALL parties (including the OAH court) will be aware of Rod’s allegations and aware of the conflict in law. Are Agencies and Departments that we think (and are constantly advertised as such) – are they “public officials” or Not ?

Pay attention to the 1st filing’s section on the NC website listing ALL the Departments and Agencies of North Carolina. Strange, isn’t it…On the NC website it says that the two agencies in question ARE part of the State’s Departments and Agencies ! SO, why did the two admin appeal judges (May and Ridgeway) uphold the first lower admin appeal court’s contention that the agencies are “independent contractors” / “private agencies” ? ? ? The OAH may (and we say, may, because nothing’s written in stone, it seems) actually have to settle the question of the two confused (?) lower admin appeal court judges (May and Ridgeway), but who knows ?

This may have to go EVEN higher in the system for resolution. But, someone, sometime WILL have to actually answer the question, don’t you think ? Rod does, that’s for sure ! Or, there may have to be some, dare we say, tar and feathers, pitchforks, rope and THE other precious metal involved (we’re sure you know what it is) !

Here’s the 3rd document (7 pages) that Rod filed.

Now, just to make it interesting, Rod has submitted the above Motion (the 3rd document) for an Emergency Hearing on the questions because they affect the People of NC on an ongoing basis and have for years ! Rod’s scheduled date for his Hearing is in September, but he wants this settled in a more timely manner. Can you blame him ? This has been going on since October of 2010 ! Stay tuned ! You never know if someone in “public office” will actually operate in a lawful manner or continue to dodge the questions and conflicts of their own obligatory Statutes !

Rod is prepared to go as HIGH in the “court” system as is required to get an answer for the People ! You may also want to google the term “Private Attorney General” !

Listen Tues and Fri, 9:00PM Eastern
http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=48361&cmd=tc
The site includes archives of calls from the past 5 or so years…

Can YOU use these documents in your case ? Yes, but only if you are able to read, comprehend the strategies and issues and act for yourself ! YOU can’t be a novice in the workings of the court system, though ! AND, You must have “trench” experience and be able to think and act on your feet !

ALL ROD CLASS DOCUMENTS ARE FREE ! BUT, MUST BE USED AT YOUR OWN RISK !
DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH BEFORE ATTEMPTING ANY OF THIS !

The AIB / Rod Class Team…

[new post] Rod Class’ Latest Coram Nobis Template 3.30.12

Click here.

APPEAL NOTICE FILED IN ROD CLASS IRS CASE

Rod’s Notice of Appeal filed in D.C.

ROD CLASS’ NEW FOIA TEMPLATE

 

This FOIA TEMPLATE  is different than the one Rod filed into North Carolina.

John Doe Smith Affidavit template.

POLICE OFFICERS ARE “PRIVATE CONTRACTORS”

Rodney Class was cited for a traffic violation by the local police department. He filed into the court a Judicial Review for an Administrative ruling on this violation.

The Dallas, North Carolina Police Department moved for dismissal of the case with prejudice stating that the officers are “Private Contractors”, therefore the court does not have jurisdiction.

See Rod’s documents:

Dallas Police Department’s Motion to Dismiss with cover letter

N.C. Attorney General’s cover letter to Wade County Superior Court

Rod’s Judicial Review, Qui Tam and Quo Warranto filings in response to the Attorney General’s 12(b) motion and “private contractors” issues.

****  Rod Class’ update on N.C. traffic case.

Objection to Attorney Pennie M. Thrower filing. 

Rod has a scheduled hearing:

APRIL 21, 2011 12:45 PM

WAKE COUNTY CIVIL SUPERIOR COURT

316 Fayetteville St, Raleigh, NC 27602

 

JUDGE E. MANNING JR

COURTROOM NUMBER 10-D 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rod hopes you can make the hearing.