Maine’s budding charter schools survive legislature by Bruce Poliquin.
“Knowledge is power. The best education for the child is crucial for a lifetime of happiness, success, and health. Education should be about the kids, not the adults. Let’s keep moving down the path of more learning approaches and environments for Maine students. The new and growing charter school option is a step in the right direction.” Read more, click here.
Charlotte Iserbyt responds:
“Another moron to add to the list. These people couldn’t add 2-2 if required. They would surely answer “3”. How does one get through to them that charters schools, with their unelected boards, are THE vehicle to get the USA moving into the Soviet unelected council form of government. “They” just don’t seem to have a problem with “taxation without representation”. They probably never studied the origins of the the United States of America, and haven’t the faintest idea why the patriots, including George Washington, decided to go to war against Great Britain.
Also, does he know what school-to-work is? Has he ever been to Cuba or China or Russia. Does he know what a quota system is. Maybe someone should give him this quote from Professor Eugene Boyce, University of Georgia, on communist education. “They do not educate for jobs that don’t exist.”
That’s really great, Mr. Poliquin…and you say our children are going to have such upward mobility, blah, blah, blah?”
Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt
Former Senior Policy Advisor
U.S. Department of Education
The Unmasking of Maine....and Beyond 
Hi!
Charter schools are ANOTHER state/general government “take over” (centralization of power from the top-down) as they did with the county courts, militia, highways, elimination of the executive council, etc.
I am currently an elected school board member.
P.S. More education to come soon.
Received new material to explore.
Thank you!
Lise from Maine
Hi!
Charlotte has mentioned that the charter schools will have an “unelected school board.”
This is what happened when the Executive Council was eliminated in 1975 by the people which was “mob rule,” and the Governor now has a “staff” that is “unelected” to advise him. He can fire them at any time, and he could not fire an elected Council.
This is “more” centralization of power coming from the top-down. In other words, more dictatorship coming from the state.
What was the intent of the Founding Fathers of Maine when they created the Executive Council in the original constitution?
To prevent “centralization of power” (dictatorship) from the top.
If any members of the Council disagreed with the Governor, they didn’t have to fear that he could and would fire them. Remember, that this Council had the power to “advise and consent,” and if they didn’t consent, then things did not go the Governor’s way.
This is a republican form of government and not a democracy. See Art. IV of the Constitution of the United States whereby the United States guaranteed to each state a republican form of government.
Did the legislature in 1974 have the delegation of authority to pass a resolve so the “mob” could vote on eliminating the Executive Council?
No!
Another piece of fraud.
Thank you!
Lise from Maine
Hi!
Here is a quote from King Solomon:
“Wisdom comes to those who search for it, but not to those who wait for it.”
I have done a great deal of research and continue to do so. My only power is to educate and expose the fraud.
Hope that most people on this blog enjoy the revelations that I share about this fraudulent democracy (communist) state of Maine.
There is more to come soon.
Thank you!
Lise from Maine
Hi!
More education:
Trial by Jury: Common Law
What is the purpose in having a trial by jury according to the course of the Common Law?
First and foremost is to STOP the government (state and federal) from taking wrongfully the life, liberty, and property of the defendant (live people and not fictions) and to protect our Common Law government of laws from the whims of mere men and women (legislators, judges, prosecutors, etc).
Our Common Law disappeared in 1959 unlawfully by those privileged members of the Maine State Bar Association who voted among themselves to remove it.
Fraud! Fraud! Fraud!
They had no right whatsoever to do this; no delegation of power to do this at all.
In other words, they “stole” from the people, and theft has NO standing in Common Law or otherwise.
The power of the jury is to give or withhold consent for the government to act or not act against one of the people (defendant).
Imagine this kind of power!
It is raw power in and of itself.
Wow!
The Common Law jury in a criminal trial is a form of “shield” or “wall” against an unlawful government.
Just say no to an unjust and unlawful law.
The Common Law jury can decide the facts of the case and the law (see Lysander Spooner’s article called Trial by Jury)
According to Common Law traditions, the juror decides for himself or herself according to his or her conscience and can by-pass the judge’s instructions which is really the “will” of the judge.
At one time, the jury selection happened at the local control (all power is inherent in the people – see Declaration of Rights, Sec. 2) in the vicinity, and the courts had to accept the jurors as they are or as they find them.
No tampering with the jurors was allowed.
Nowadays, the jurors are selected from the voter application form from a certain county, who declare themselves to be citizens of the United States of America (foreign entity) and not citizens of the United States (14th amendment citizen), whereby they are federal subjects (probably, if the truth be known, are UN subjects – New World Order citizens).
Once the jurors arrive at the courthouse, they are counted, given a speech by the so-called judge, and given a questionnaire to fill out.
Is this a Common Law tradition?
NO!
The jurors are selected or rejected according to what they write on the questionnaires by the defense attorney and the prosecutor in the case and perhaps the judge’s decision, too.
This is absolutely wrong and unlawful.
This is NOT a process of and by the people but from a centralization of power from the top-down = the state.
This is government selected jurors (centralization of power from the top-down) in order to meet its own needs hoping for a conviction.
A few years ago I was selected for jury duty and filled out the questionnaire and was one of about 25 people selected to be interviewed by the so-called judge (it was so-called judge Horton at the time), the defense attorney, and the prosecutor in the judge’s chambers regarding a murder case in my county.
I thought to myself “oh, boy, am I going to have fun in the judge’s chambers,” and I did.
I asked so-called judge Horton if he had a commission.
Guess what he said.
He said, “I don’t know.”
How can you, as the judge, not know if you have a commission or not?
Was I challenging his authority?
Of course I was!
Did he like this questioning?
No!
So I decided to educate him a little, and told him the definition of a commission and what it accomplishes plus told him of various laws that said that the justices MUST be commissioned.
Needless to say, he didn’t respond to any of that but decided to ask me questions about the questionnaire instead.
Silence!
What does silence in this instance actually say when he has a duty to speak?
He knew he was caught so he had to move on.
Was I selected for jury duty?
Of course not!
I was viewed as a “dangerous” person who knew too much so he had to get rid of me right on the front end (perhaps the defense attorney and the prosecutor wanted me out, too).
But guess what?
I had fun with it.
This is a classic example of using one’s power to learn the truth of the matter at hand.
By the way, there was a recorder present in the room. I am willing to bet that the recording disappeared or is hidden somewhere.
Lesson: Use your power whenever you can. Grab the moment when you see an opportunity.
I grabbed the moment because I knew that I probably would never have this chance again to challenge a so-called judge.
I always seek out opportunities at any given time.
A Common Law juror is a freeman whereby under his or her oath seeks to do right by his or her conscience as it relates to the facts of the case and the application of the law.
A Common Law juror does not have to listen to the judge’s instructions which is his will, of course.
How does a juror know that the so-called judge is telling the truth when he instructs the jury?
He or she doesn’t know that.
What do so-called judges tell the jury nowadays?
It goes like this: blah,blah,blah…………….., and you must accept the law as I give it.
Really?
What does this actually mean?
What he is saying implicitly is that I am the one who is educated in law, and I am the elite here so you, the jury, have to accept the law as I GIVE IT TO YOU (his will).
Oh really!
Is this tampering with the jury?
Most certainly appears that way to me.
What we are under today is the Roman Civil Law whereby the jurors,
foreign agents today as above-mentioned, are sworn to the loyalty of the state.
How nice!
The juror must obey the truth, and if the so-called judge’s instructions violates the truth, then the juror is obligated to vote towards the truth and nothing else.
His oath requires that he operate in truth, and he or she cannot commit a wrong by going against his or her conscience no matter what the so-called judge says in his instructions.
All for now.
More to come later on this subject as it is a fascinating subject.
The people need to learn the “power” that they “have” in order to administer justice and “take away” the power of a fraudulent government such as we have today in Maine.
Thank you!
Lise from Maine
Hi!
Mistake! Mistake!
I just learned that it is NOT the voter application form that is used to select a potential jury.
It is the driver’s license that is used.
It really doesn’t matter since both are fraudulent processes in the first instance.
See definition of state in the Maine motor vehicle code – “state” is a territory of the United States.
Really?
How can this be?
Isn’t Maine a free and independent state?
I guess not!
So if a person (live, breathing person) does not have a driver’s (driver is a commercial term) license, then that person is eliminated from being a potential juror.
Isn’t this discriminatory?
Isn’t this “selective” choosing as to who can be on a jury and who cannot?
Who does the choosing?
Once again, it is a decision coming from the top-down centralization of power (the state) and away from the people’s power.
The same would apply to the voter application form if that were the case.
Thank you!
Lise from Maine
Hi!
Did a search on the internet:
Maine Judicial branch (supposed to be department and not branch).
“There are two steps in the jury selection process. The first step is taken when a person’s name is placed on a list to be summoned for jury duty. The second step is taken when a person is chosen for jury duty in an individual case.”
“Jury lists represent a random computer selection of persons living within a given area based upon lists of names supplied by the Secretary of State Motor Vehicle Division. These lists include the names of licensed Maine drivers, people with State ID’s and people who have asked to be eligible for jury service. Each person selected is sent a questionnaire which must be completed and a summons which instructs the prospective juror to report for jury service on a specific date at a specific time and court location.”
Thank you!
Lise from Maine