Breaking: BLM to Cease Bundy Ranch Operation

“Clark County Sheriff Douglas C. Gillespie announced that the Bureau of Land Management will cease their persecution of cattle rancher Cliven Bundy.” Read more HERE.

View Live Broadcast HERE.

Related: Nevada Stand Off – This is Bigger Than Cliven Bundy…, click here.

Published in: on April 12, 2014 at 12:36 pm  Leave a Comment  

Nevada – Bundy Ranch – Live NOW

Live NOW… HERE.

Also LIVE: Clark Co. Sheriff Announces BLM ‘Will Cease Operation,’ Open Land to Public with Alex Jones, HERE.

Published in: on April 12, 2014 at 11:56 am  Leave a Comment  

Education in a Global Era: The U.S.- Asia Connection

This is loaded!  Read every word, HERE.

Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt
Former Senior Policy Advisor
U.S. Department of Education

http://www.deliberatedumbingdown.com 
http://www.americandeception.com 

To order the updated abridged 2011 version  of “the deliberate dumbing down of america”, it is available from 3D Research at Amazon.com.

Published in: on April 12, 2014 at 10:03 am  Leave a Comment  

Harry Reid, China, Behind Nevada Land Grab

Published on Apr 11, 2014

TheAlexJonesChannel reports “Alex Jones and the Infowars crew put the pieces together to show Harry Reids plans to sell US land to China under the publics noses.”

View broadcast HERE.

Related: Nevada Stand Off – This is Bigger Than Cliven Bundy…, click here.

breitbart.com reports “Harry Reid’s Son Representing Chinese Solar Panel Plant In $5 Billion Nevada Deal”, click here.

examiner.com reports “Reid’s shady secret land deal behind Nev. dispute, click here.

Published in: on April 11, 2014 at 11:39 pm  Leave a Comment  

Bundy Ranch Federal Land Grab Motive Revealed

Published on Apr 11, 2014

NextNewsNetwork reports “”Who is behind the Bundy Ranch Federal Assault? Why are they targeting the Bundy Family? Where is the mainstream media? Why are they silent? Gary Franchi and Mike Adams tackle these questions and reveal the truth behind the Federal Land grab.”

View broadcast (16:47) HERE.

Related: Nevada Stand Off – This is Bigger Than Cliven Bundy…, click here.

Published in: on April 11, 2014 at 11:06 pm  Leave a Comment  

Check Out Chris Christie’s Advisors…Henry Kissinger

“How disgusting can things get?

Please, activists, do NOT allow this terribly important information to shut down your efforts to preserve a free America for future generations.

How BAD can it get? Did all these guys take courses in “treason”? Are some of the younger ones not traitors, but just dumbed down?

Regardless, use this info to expose fact that Republicans and Democrats are the same at the top.

WASHINGTON, D.C. NEEDS MORE THAN A HOUSE CLEANING…it needs FUMIGATION.”

 

New Jersey Governor Chris Christie

“As if all the other putzes weren’t bad enough, this one takes the cake, and I would guess this is the type of person the RNC will run against Hillary Clinton. Does anyone really like this guy? He seems hell bent on including Islamists in every part of his administration. Just look at the radicals he’s appointed to his security forum. The Clarion Project has written extensively about Christie’s propensity to hire radical Islamists.

Guess who is on his advisory list….former Secretary of State and Council on Foreign Relations member, Condoleezza Rice. She’s in good company with Council for National Policy member, Richard V. Allen at the Hoover Institution at Stanford. Remember Allen, while at Heritage Foundation, drafted NAFTA resulting in the destruction of manufacturing jobs in America. Another at Hoover Institution is Council for National Policy member, Edwin Meese, former Reagan administration Attorney General, who is now on the board of Heritage Foundation and paid half a million per year.

Christie’s second advisor is Richard N. Haass, President of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), a position he has held since July 2003. Haass also has been Vice President and Director of Foreign Policy Studies at The Brookings Institution, a senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a Lecturer in Public Policy at Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government, and a research associate at the International Institute for Strategic Studies. A Rhodes Scholar, Haass holds a B.A. from Oberlin College [1973] and both the Master and Doctor of Philosophy degrees from Oxford University [1975; 1982]. Remember, the Brookings Institution is funded by the Rockefeller Foundation and the Carnegie Corporation of New York.

The third Council on Foreign Relations member of Christie’s advisory team is Robert E. Grady, venture capitalist and former White House associate budget director. Grady is currently a Managing Director at Cheyenne Capital, a $500 million private equity fund. For the decade prior to joining Cheyenne Capital, he was a prominent partner at the Carlyle Group. Currently, he is managing director at Cheyenne Capital, Chairman of the State of New Jersey Council of Economic Advisors for Governor Christie, and Chairman of New Jersey’s State Investment Council, which oversees the state’s $72 billion pension fund. Grady also serves as a director of multiple public and private companies.

And finally, the coup de gras, Henry Kissinger! That infamous Soviet Agent is going to help advise Chris Christie on how to get elected to the White House! Link

Same old, same old, isn’t it?! All of the advisors to these three presidential hopefuls are tried and true bureaucrats from the neo-conservative, corporate fascist, phony Republican right. Sadly, it does not appear we’ll have an opportunity to vote for a true old-right Constitutional conservative this time around either.”

2016 REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL HOPEFULS AND THEIR ADVISORS, read more HERE.

This info sure identifies the problem we are facing.

Kelleigh Nelson is to be listened to, yesterday, now, and tomorrow.
View Kelleigh Nelson’s presentation – False Friends on the Right – Disc 5, HERE.

AND THEN WHAT? YOU, YES “YOU” SPREAD THE WORD FAR AND WIDE.

Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt
Former Senior Policy Advisor
U.S. Department of Education

http://www.deliberatedumbingdown.com

http://www.americandeception.com

To order the updated abridged 2011 version of “the deliberate dumbing down of america”, it is available from 3D Research at Amazon.com.

Published in: on April 11, 2014 at 8:11 pm  Leave a Comment  

Nevada Stand Off – This is Bigger Than Cliven Bundy…

April 12, 2014 

Live from the ranch with Chuck Smith and Col. Roy Potter on the phone!

Listen HERE.

April 11 2014

Immediate family friend of the Bundy’s tells it all in a mail sent to Jimstonefreelance.com. Read more HERE.

Published on Apr 11, 2014

NextNewsNetwork reports “BREAKING: Cell Towers Shut Down at Bundy Ranch Siege”

We’re getting reports that the cell towers have been shut down in the area of the Cliven Bundy Ranch. We need your help in confirming these reports as we cannot reach our correspondents on the scene. Please leave your comments if you are able to verify these claims.

View HERE.

Published on Apr 10, 2014

“Cliven Bundy speaking at the Moapa Valley Town Board meeting 04/09/14. Contact the Nevada State Governor and tell him we don’t want Agenda 21.”

View HERE.

http://gov.nv.gov/contact/
Clark County Sheriffs Number. 1-702-828-3233

“Published on Apr 10, 2014

NextNewsNetwork reports “BREAKING: Militia Arrives at Bundy Ranch.”

“We bring you now the latest from the Bundy Ranch, where the militia has arrived in support of Cliven Bundy in his stand off against the Federal Government, where the Bureau of Land Management has surrounded his ranch with snipers, helicopters and heavy equipment.

Governor Sandoval and Sen. Dean Heller have condemned the actions of the BLM:

The governor has released a statement: “No cow justifies the atmosphere of intimidation which currently exists nor the limitation of constitutional rights that are sacred to all Nevadans.”

Sheriff Richard Mack, of the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association, has declared the Governor’s words to be, just that – WORDS – and that immediate action on the part of the Governor should be take to call off the pending Range War.

Radio Host Pete Santilli of Guerrilla Media Network, is standing by on the scene where the Militia has arrived to support the Bundy Family.

Rusty Hill a former Land Broker who worked in that area for nearly 20 years issued this to our news room,

“It is not about turtles it is about water. There are developers working for military contractors that want that land and water for mining weapons grade minerals for industry… they want to sell the land by the highway for real estate development because it’s close to I-15 and the Bundy’s have been refusing to sell what they actually own directly for over 20 years. Many buyers sent me out there with crazy offers for that land for many years. It is prime real estate not worthless desert. There is a natural gas pipeline going through there and lots of water under ground too. Somebody connected to a military corporation is using political power and the BLM to muscle those people out.”

We go now to Pete Santilli on the scene where the Militia has arrived.”

View broadcast (14:00) HERE.

CBSLasVegas reports “‘Expect To See A Band Of Soldiers’: Militia Members Arrive At Nevada Ranch.” Read more HERE.

Related: Bundy Ranch Stand Off – The Next Waco?, click here.

Published in: on April 10, 2014 at 3:55 pm  Comments (2)  

Michael Farris Patrick Henry College…. Model United Nations team

Please forward to your lists, especially home school parents.

Model United Nations team, click here.

The Man Behind Parental Rights Amendment – Patrick Henry College, click here.

Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt
Former Senior Policy Advisor
U.S. Department of Education

http://www.deliberatedumbingdown.com 

http://www.americandeception.com 

To order the updated abridged 2011 version of “the deliberate dumbing down of america”, it is available from 3D Research at Amazon.com.

Published in: on April 10, 2014 at 3:26 pm  Leave a Comment  

Federal v. State Boundaries

Courtesy of Lise from Maine

Original Constitution of the united states.

1.  In Article IV, Section 3 of the Constitution of the United States it states in part:

“New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new State  shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or Parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress.  The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States;”

2.  In Article IV, Section 4 of the same constitution it states in part:

“The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government,….”

3.  In Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 it states:

“To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;–And…”

Why is this very, very significant?

4.  In Title 1 (MRS – Maine Revised Statutes, thereinafter known as MRS), Chapter 3, Section 72, number 21 it states:

“21. State.  “State,” used with reference to any organized portion of the United States, may mean a territory or the District of Columbia. [ 1965, c. 513, §1 (AMD) .]”

“26-A. United States.  “United States” includes territories and the District of Columbia. [ 1969, c. 433, §7 (RPR) .]”

5.  In Title 19-A (MRS), Section 101, number 9 states:

“9.  Person.  “Person” means an individual, trust, estate, partnership, association, company, corporation, political subdivision of the State, instrumentality of the State or other entity.”

“10.  State.  The term “state” means any state, territory or possession of the United States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia. [ 1995, c. 694, Pt. B, §2 (NEW); 1995, c. 694, Pt. E, §2 (AFF) .]”

Significance of the above-mentioned:
1. This state operating today “belongs” (a federal state or territory such as the status [lower status] as Puerto Rico, and so forth) to the United States. What happened to the “free and independent” State [a superior status to a federal state or territory] as mentioned in the “original” Constitution of the State of Maine and continues to say in the statutory constitution of 2013 (preamble)?

2. The “general” government shall “guarantee” to each State a “republican” [of the people, for the people, and by the people] form of government.

3. The “general” government can ONLY have property of NO MORE than 10 miles square in each State. Land must be ceded to the United States by the Legislatures, the United States must accept it, and it must pay for it.

4. Article IV, Section 3 of the Constitution of the United States speaks about new States and so forth.

Can the original States be lawfully converted to territories or federal states of the United States?
Absolutely not!

Are the States accepting federal funding? Yes, they are. Are they federal states or territories of the United States? Appears that way but it is a fraud, and it is treasonous against the people.

What “kind” of states are operating today?

Federal states or territories. In other words, federal states are territories of the United States.

The general government can ONLY own property regarding 10 miles square in each State, and the 10 miles square is the ONLY place where the general government has a delegation of authority. It is a jurisdictional issue. The Founding Fathers did not want the general government to “control” the States.

Read and understand Article IV, Section 3 of the Constitution of the United States once again.
10 miles square is mandatory by the said constitution.

Boundary Stones, click here.

Related: Boundary Stones of the District of Columbia, click here.

 

Please be courteous to Lise and credit her as she has conducted this research and more for almost seven (7) years. She has spent a great deal of time attempting to put the pieces of the puzzle together showing fraud and treason over time.

 

Published in: on April 10, 2014 at 1:23 pm  Comments (1)  

U.S. Department Of Education MUST Be Abolished!

PARENTS ARE FIGHTING THE WRONG BATTLE!!!!!!!!!!

The No. 1 problem facing parents/teachers going up against Communist Core is: the United States Department of Education which is tied into the international UNESCO, OECD, etc.

Parents will never bring their public or private schools back to local control and academics as long as the United States Department of Education is NOT abolished…and that means all its labs and centers as well.

The source of every rotten bit of Communist Core can be traced back to the U.S. Department of Education, its labs, centers and UNESCO.

Don’t let anyone tell you otherwise. If they do tell you otherwise, they are either uninformed or lying.

Instead of running all over the country, funded by Heritage Foundation and other neocon groups, getting legislation passed to kill Communist Core, parents should be raising big bucks to put ads in every state newspaper, The Wall Street Journal, all major city newspapers DEMANDING THAT THE U.S. DEPT. OF EDUCATION BE ABOLISHED.

Remember how Reagan used that promise to get elected President in 1979?

Why? Because the Republicans at that time, in late seventies, knew Americans would vote for him if he promised to get rid of the Department.

I recall at the time that a high percentage of public school teachers supported Reagan for that very reason.

Sure would be nice if parents understood what I am trying to say.”

“We education researchers, some of whom are involved in the Exposing the Global Road to Ruin through Education disc sets raised $5000 in 1985 to put a full page ad in The Washington Times to expose these treasonous agreements which President Ronald Reagan. We also raised $5000 to hold a press conference at the National Press Club to expose these agreements. The disc sets, and one cd (disc #8) which includes superb written submissions, are FREE to view at deliberatedumbingdown.com and at Charlotte Iserbyt You Tube Channel.

Our people had better read every word of these agreements, especially the sections on educational exchanges, curriculum development, and technology! They should, at the same time, read “Soviets in the Classroom…America’s Latest education Fad”, 1989, which covers not only these agreements, but the Carnegie Corporation’s Agreement (President David Hamburg) with the Soviet Academy of Science which included development of computer courseware in critical thinking for early elementary school children. For the Marxist change agents implementing Communist Core and other diabolical programs, Critical Thinking is Marxist Thinking. Lenin, himself, defined “thinking” as being NOT absolute, but evolving. Doesn’t that sound familiar?

Is it any wonder it was Reagan who arranged for public/private (corporate fascist) partnerships necessary for implementing the Soviet polytech (school to work) system necessary for planned economy, going in right now? Exactly what Carnegie Corporation called for in 1934 in Conclusions and Recommendations for the Social Studies?

Is it any wonder he did not fulfill his promise to abolish the U.S. Dept. of Education?

People should focus, focus, focus. There is one and only one action which will take care of the problem facing our nation today in education:

THE UNITED STATES MUST ABOLISH THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION WHICH IS IN BED WITH ALL EDUCATION MINISTRIES AROUND THE WORLD AND TAKES IT ORDERS FROM UNESCO. HOW MANY PEOPLE REALIZE THAT IN 1970 NINETEEN OF UNESCO’S EDUCATION ADVISORS, OUT OF TWENTY, CAME FROM COMMUNIST COUNTRIES?

And our people pick away at Communist Core, thinking it is something new, not going after the ever-increasing international control being carried out by the U.S. Dept. of Education.

THE GENERAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS, click here.

Soviets In The Classroom: America’s Latest Education Fad, click here.

Here are some excerpts from “Soviets in the Classroom…”

1. Cambridge-based Educators for Social Responsibility (ESR) project, “Educating for New Ways of Thinking: An American-Soviet Institute.” Two such institute sessions have been held (one in Leningrad the summer of 1989) at which “Soviet and American educators examined classroom theory and practice in critical thinking about social and political issues and worked on recommendations and resources for improving the ways we teach about each other’s country, and on A Source-Book for New Ways of Thinking in Education: A U.S.-Soviet Guide for use by teachers and students in both countries.”

“Critical thinking” is the latest fad to hit our children’s classrooms. N. Landa’s Lenin: On Educating Youth, published by the Soviet state-controlled Novosti Press, quotes Lenin on “thinking” as follows:

To pose a real question means to define a problem which demands a new approach and new research…. Sometimes accepted truth no longer answers as a solution for a serious and pressing problem. The school should cultivate in pupils the ability to perceive scientifically evolved truths as stages along the endless road of cognition—not as something stationary and set.

More recently, an article in Education Week (4–9–86) entitled “Are Teachers Ready to Teach Pupils to Think?” laments the fact that graduating college seniors show little evolution of alternative views on any issue, tending to treat all opinions as equally good, tending to hold opinions based largely on whims or unsubstantiated beliefs, and hesitating to take stands based on evidence and reason. Summing up a decade of research in the 1960’s, O.J. Harvey laments that very high percentages… [of educators] “operated in cognitive styles grounded in absolute assumptions—viewing reality in terms of good/bad, right/wrong, and either/or, while attributing goodness and truth to wise and all-knowing authorities.”

One doesn’t have to have a Ph.D. to accurately predict what U.S.-Soviet jointly developed critical thinking curricula will look like. Do American parents want their children exposed to this type of education, especially when it will also be on computer where they can’t get their hands on it?

2. The Carnegie Corporation’s exchange agreement with the Soviet Academy of Sciences has resulted in “joint research on the application of computers in early elementary education, focusing especially on the teaching of higher level skills and complex subjects to younger children.” (“Higher level skills” is often a euphemism for “critical thinking skills,” or values, attitudes, etc.) Carnegie’s 1988 one-year, $250,000 grant is funding implementation of this program, coordinated on the American side by Michael Cole, Director of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition at the University of California, San Diego.

3. The American-Soviet Textbook Study Project began in 1977, was suspended in 1979 when Soviet troops invaded Afghanistan, and resumed in 1985 under the Geneva Agreement. At a conference held in Racine, Wisconsin in November 1987, the U.S. representatives acquiesced to the Soviet insistence that American textbooks should present a more “balanced” (i.e., friendly) discussion of Lenin and should give the Russians more “credit” for their role in World War II. A.M. Rosenthal of the New York Times said in a December 8, 1987 editorial that American educators solemnly discuss with Soviet educators the mutual need for textbook revision, just as if the state did not censor every single book published in the Soviet Union and the Russians could write as they pleased. That is comedy, if you like it real black.

4. Scholars from the American Council of Learned Societies and the Ministry of Education of the Soviet Union met in the United States in 1986 and agreed to establish a Commission on Education that will be responsible for joint scholarly relations in pedagogy and related fields between the United States and the Soviet Union. Some major joint U.S.-Soviet project themes are: Methods of Teaching and Learning School Science and Math Subjects Using Computers; Theory of Teaching and Learning; Psychological and Pedagogical Problems of Teaching in the Development of Pre-School and School-age Children, and Problems of Teaching Children with Special Needs.

5. Scholars from the American Council of Learned Societies and the Ministry of Education of the Soviet Union met in the United States in 1986 and agreed to establish a Commission on Education that will be responsible for joint scholarly relations in pedagogy and related fields between the United States and the Soviet Union.

Some major joint U.S.-Soviet project themes are: Methods of Teaching and Learning School Science and Math Subjects Using Computers; Theory of Teaching and Learning; Psychological and Pedagogical Problems of Teaching in the Development of Pre-School and School-age Children, and Problems of Teaching Children with Special Needs.

6. The Copen Foundation/New York State Education Department/Soviet Academy of Sciences agreement “links students, teachers, administrators in U.S. and Soviet schools by computer and video-telephone lines.” Mr. Copen declared Soviet officials are especially interested in studying the effects of telecommunications on intercultural understanding, teaching methods, and learning outcomes, and that the Soviets have assigned five scientists to monitor the project.

7. This agreement should be challenged on constitutional grounds since Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution says, “No State shall, without the consent of Congress,… enter into any agreement or compact with another State, or with a foreign power.

Sure would be nice if parents understood what I am trying to say.”

Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt
Former Senior Policy Advisor
U.S. Department of Education

http://www.deliberatedumbingdown.com 

To order the updated abridged 2011 version of “the deliberate dumbing down of america”, it is available from 3D Research at Amazon.com.

To view all of Charlotte’s posts – in the search engine type in “Charlotte Iserbyt”.

Published in: on April 10, 2014 at 10:45 am  Leave a Comment  
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 144 other followers