Courtesy of Lise from Maine
Constitution of the State of Maine (1988) – Amendment
The so-called amendment of 1988 pertaining to making the language of the constitution gender-neutral is absolute fraud and treason.
Why is that?
First of all, you have to look at the “original” Constitution of the State of Maine (1820) in order to understand “how” the constitution can be amended lawfully. You won’t find this in the “statutory” constitution of 2013 so you have to examine the “origin” of changing the constitution lawfully.
In Article 10, Section 4 it states: “The Legislature, whenever two thirds of both houses shall deem it necessary, may propose amendments to this Constitution; and when any amendment shall be so agreed upon, a resolution shall be passed and sent to the selectmen of the several towns, and the assessors of the several plantations, empowering and directing them to notify the inhabitants of their respective towns and plantations, in the manner prescribed by law, at their next annual meetings in the month of September, to give in their votes on the question, whether such amendment shall be made; and if it shall appear that a majority of the inhabitants voting on the question are in favor of such amendment, it shall become a part of this Constitution.”
Take notice of the last part of this article and section where it says that “if it shall appear that a majority of the inhabitants voting on the question are in favor of such amendment, it shall become a part of this Constitution.”
This means that the amendment “itself” MUST (must is mandatory) become a part of the constitution if the inhabitants voting are in favor of it.
Also notice that it says NOTHING about any Chief Justice arranging and rearranging or omitting anything in the constitution plus it says NOTHING
about having the “approval” of the legislature as the 1875 unlawful amendment says. Since 1876 when the 1875 amendment went into effect, the constitution was codified unlawfully, and all constitutions have been codified fraudulently since then.
What the unlawful 1988 amendment does, in fact, is change most of the constitution where the language refers to the male gender such as his, men
and so forth. Even the preamble has been changed from “His” to God’s.
How can this amendment “itself” become part of the lawful constitution?
It cannot as it is an impossibility prescribed by constitutional law.
Furthermore, is it “really” an amendment?
No, it is not.
In fact, most of the constitution was changed to be gender-neutral, and this is unlawful.
What the legislature could have done lawfully is propose an amendment to “include” women in the constitution and have “that” amendment, if approved, become a “part” of the constitution itself.