York County (ME) Prosecutor, Thomas Miscio, Files Motion To Bar Public From Court Hearing

Can you stomach any more of Maine’s judicial system?

PPH reports “A York County prosecutor is asking the judge in a domestic violence case to exclude the public from a court proceeding scheduled for Friday and make whatever happens there secret.

In a motion filed late Thursday in York County Superior Court in the case of 33-year-old Paul Olsen, Assistant District Attorney Thomas Miscio said material could be introduced at Friday’s hearing that, whether true or false, could damage the careers of officers from the Eliot Police Department.

Miscio’s request comes just a week after a judge in Portland made a controversial ruling to prohibit the media from reporting witness testimony in a criminal case against a well-known Standish attorney, Anthony J. Sineni III, who was being sentenced on charges of assault and disorderly conduct.

Judge Jeffrey Moskowitz rescinded that gag order days later, admitted it was unlawful and apologized after the Portland Press Herald defied the order and First Amendment experts criticized it.

On Thursday, Justice John O’Neil Jr. left the courthouse in Alfred without ruling on Miscio’s motion, leaving it uncertain whether the public will be allowed into Friday’s hearing, which is scheduled for 2 p.m.

Olsen’s attorney, Amy Fairfield, hopes to convince the judge at Friday’s hearing that some of the officers who investigated the case against Olsen in 2012 have a proven record of falsifying police documents.”

Read more HERE.

UPDATE 1-16-15

Justice John O’Neil Jr. denied Assistant District Attorney Thomas Miscio’s motion.

PPH reports “Former deputy says Eliot chief knew officers falsified reports. The chief of the Eliot Police Department, Theodor Short, knew that a majority of the town’s police officers consistently falsified their patrol reports and he did nothing about it, the department’s former deputy chief said in York County Superior Court on Friday. Testifying during a hearing for an unrelated criminal case, former deputy chief Kevin Cady said he presented a 60-plus-page report to the chief documenting how he discovered that four of the department’s six patrol officers had repeatedly lied in their reports.

Cady said he gave the report to Chief Theodor Short in April 2009.

“He told me that I had opened a can of worms,” Cady said of Short’s response.

Another former Eliot police officer, Kevin Curran, also testified Friday that he had seen Cady’s report in the Eliot police station as recently as 2011.

But the police chief has told the court that Cady’s report never existed, according to attorney Amy Fairfield, who subpoenaed both former officers as witnesses in the criminal case. Short did not appear in court. But the town’s attorney, Asha Echeverria, defended him by saying that no finalized report exists and no officer wrongdoing had been proven.

Court recessed for the day Friday before the conclusion of the hearing. Testimony is expected to resume within the next few weeks at a date to be determined.

“This absolutely needs to be done in public,” Fairfield said after court adjourned. “It keeps people honest. They need to know that people are watching. There are a lot of good cops out there, but there are some who are not so good.”

Read more HERE.

Related:  Judge Jeffrey Moskowitz Apologized And Acknowledged That His Order Was Not Lawful, click here.

Kennebunk (ME) Prostitution Case,  2-14-13, 2-22-13 click here. – People are still questioning if the DA made the deal so the other prominent names do not become public. They wonder why the Press Herald or the News Media have never gone after that list.

Freedom of Access requests to York  County D.A. FOIA – clarification, February 7, 2013

FOIA response from D.A. Kathryn Slattery, dated February 14, 2013 claiming the remaining suspects have not been charged.

Why weren’t the remainder summoned?

Published in: on January 16, 2015 at 2:14 am  Comments (30)  

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://unmasker4maine.wordpress.com/2015/01/16/york-county-me-prosecutor-thomas-miscio-files-motion-to-bar-public-from-court-hearing/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

30 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. Hi!

    Why doesn’t former Deputy Chief Kevin Cady produce “his” copy of the 60 page report in order to show that, indeed, the report does exist?

    Did he keep a copy for himself?

    If it exist, then he post it online for all to see.

    If no such report exist, then he lied in his testimony and a perjury charge can happen.

    Thank you!

    Lise from Maine

    • Hearings will continue and this should come out. The contrary arguments beg one question….do police lie? Yes, and documents will be part of a new post.

  2. Hi!

    Eliot police officer, Kevin Curran, testified that he has seen the 60 page report as early as 2011.

    Is he lying?

    If so, then a perjury charge can happen in this situation, too.

    So, who is lying?

    Is the police chief lying?

    If so, then he is responsible for covering-up and charges can be brought against him.

    This is a black and white issue.

    Does the 60 page report exist or does it not exist?

    Which one is it?

    Once again, who is lying?

    It can’t be both.

    Thank you!

    Lise from Maine

  3. Hi!

    Furthermore, prosecutor Thomas Miscio filed a motion to prevent the public from attending a court hearing in the Olsen case.

    What is this really about?

    More protection of someone which he views as “important?”

    The “nerve” of him attempting this.

    Is he an idiot after what happened with the Moskowitz gag order?

    Is he an idiot?

    So prosecutor Miscio may want to protect the police officers who may have falsified reports against Paul Olsen.

    No evidence has been shown yet that any police officers falsified anything.

    This would, indeed, open a can of worms.

    Can most prosecutors be trusted?

    No, as most of them are liars and crooks themselves.

    Additionally, is prosecutor Miscio really “admitting” that court sessions here in Maine are actually “private” courts by filing a motion to bar the public from attending a court hearing in the Olsen case?

    In Article 1, Section 6 of the Constitution of the State of Maine (original and statutory) it says that in “all” criminal prosecutions there shall be a “speedy, public and impartial trial.”

    It say nothing about a “hearing.”

    Plain and simple “all” court sessions are “public” unless, of course, these are “private” administrative courts.

    Is this what prosecutor Miscio admitting?

    So, do we have “kangaroo” courts here in Maine?

    Yes, we do.

    There are NO county courts, within and for the county (local control), no commissioned judges, and no trial by jury of “his peers” since 1935.

    All of this is now gone.


    Just plain gone!

    These courts here in Maine are nothing more than “administrative” courts acting “for” the state with “administrators” presiding “enforcing” the will of the state, and the trial by jury is a trial by jury of the government.

    Any chances of winning in these “fake” courts with “fake” judges and “fake” trial by juries?

    Very slim to none.

    See my book called “Where Did The Original Constitutional State Go? by Lise Dupont which is available in all bookstores but cheaper at barnesandnoble.com and amazon.com.

    Wake up, folks!

    Watch and listen to what is going on in these courts sessions.

    They are quite revealing.

    Thank you!

    Lise from Maine

    • A key phrase here is “open a can of worms.” When I met with several attorneys about taking on the case in the theft of my business and home, I would hear “I don’t want to open a can of worms.” Are you getting the picture?

  4. Hi!

    I sure do get the picture.

    It’s all fraud and treason against the people plus certain persons in “high” places choose to “protect” others in high places.

    I get the picture for sure.

    It’s “organized” crime.

    Thank you!

  5. Hi!

    Do police lie?

    That was a question that was on the “questionnaire” that we all had to fill out when about 120 of us were summoned to the South Paris, Maine Superior Court house see if we “passed the test” to be on the jury.

    I responded by saying that “some do” and “some don’t.”

    When I was one of about 35 that was chosen to go to “fake” judge Horton’s chambers, I was questioned about this once again.

    I stuck to my response.

    God forbid.

    The fake judge and others do not want any member of the public to even think that some of the police lie.

    It’s ONLY common sense that some will lie and that some will not as they don’t all live in a vacuum. They are individuals.

    Keep in mind, that being required to fill out a questionnaire is the government’s way to learn “how” someone thinks, and if the government doesn’t like what someone said, then they will NEVER be allowed on a jury.

    This is a classic case of a trial by jury of the government and is jury tampering.

    Article 1, Section 7 of the Constitution of the State of Maine (original and statutory) says in part: “The legislature shall provide by law a suitable and impartial mode of selection juries…”

    Take notice that it says “juries” (plural) meaning both the Grand Jury and the Petit Jury.

    The government has NO delegation of authority to require anyone to fill out a questionnaire and decide who gets on the jury and who does not.

    See the law of 1821 regarding jury selection that is on this blog.

    Lastly, of course, some of the police lie and some do not.

    Thank you!

    Lise from Maine

  6. Hi!

    With my response that some of the police do lie and some do not, was I chosen to be on the jury?

    Of course not!

    The government via the judge and so forth didn’t like what I said.

    So I wasn’t chosen.

    Isn’t this nice?

    Is this constitutional via Article 1, Section 7?

    No, it is not.

    Does anyone continue to think that we have a “justice” court system here in Maine?

    Let me tell you straight out.

    We don’t come anywhere near it at all.

    Thank you!

    Lise from Maine

  7. We The People of Maine Inc. according to the Aroostook Watchman have an in with the self proclaimed constitutional Governor I would think they would notice him of these goings on and “VOLAR” this would all be straightened out, honorable police, honorable judges with commissions, honorable AGs office, honorable and constitutionally operating Sec. of STATE, all courts guaranteeing your/my common law remedy.
    No hold it, wait a minute, forget the above I just woke up, I was dreaming!

    • Yes you must be dreaming…you can’t “fix” years of wrongs….overnight! And what is “VOLAR”? Did you mean “voila”?

      • “YES” and did you ever realize sometimes you can get a response
        with a little “misspealling” when you can’t with the truth?
        that is what spell check is for.

  8. Lise, you stated “being required to fill out a questionnaire is the government’s way to learn “how” someone thinks, and if the government doesn’t like what someone said, then they will NEVER be allowed on a jury.” So true and can be proven. Please listen to EPISODE 45, Maine Exposed: https://unmasker4maine.wordpress.com/2014/12/06/talkshoe-radio-law-enforcement-does-excessive-force-exist-in-maine/

  9. I can’t believe either you or Lise think this is an earth shaking pronouncement that the court system chooses who can and who cannot serve the court as a make believe juror, and you could not find anything to comment on about my comments above, your comments in episode 48 you stated something to the effect that “We The People of Maine Inc.” had accomplished so much, SO MUCH WHAT??

    Its not the government that chooses jurors its the court, a private bunch of BAR card holders (foreign agents) in their private tribunals.

    • I don’t think this is “an earth shaking pronouncement.” But this is more info that must be shared for uneducated/uninformed people.

      WTP of Maine, Inc. have educated many people, legislators, etc. More people have an understanding of our “system.” What are you doing to help move forward?

  10. Hi Mr. Kane,

    You sound very angry and disgusted.

    What is the problem?

    I use this forum to educate as many people as I can even if I repeat myself since so many people just “don’t get it” and are uninformed.

    Is that a problem to you?

    Thank you!

    Lise from Maine

    • Hi Lise: The problem I have is believing the people that open this web site are not intelligent enough to understand what has been written, and I’m all for educating but repeating your self while believing the people reading what you have written (don’t get it) is re-education at best and put down at worst, like going to school and the teacher reading the same page every day and you know your going to be tested on the rest of the book.
      Then writing to question certain things being said and receiving a reply with the only answer being you don’t know how to spell so you
      can’t be bright enough to get any answer, while telling your readers how the politicians are being won over, and the same day they hid behind closed doors and pretend to take an oath.
      I do not know how many people log on to this site but I know a little controversy will draw more, the more that read the more you educate maybe some of those politicians WTPofM Inc. thought paid attention to them in Augusta.
      One can only hoppe.

  11. Hi!

    Why bother to log on to this site?

    Sounds like you are not happy so find a place where you will
    become satisfied.

    Perhaps you need to go elsewhere. What you wrote doesn’t make any sense.

    Are you an agitator for the sake of agitating?

    Thank you!

    Lise from Maine

    • That’s a well thought out reply! a reading comprehension course might be in order, but then maybe your right I should go elsewhere, it appears this site only wants readers that agree with and hang on every word written by a select few, and at the same time the select few know full well the vast majority of readers “don’t get it”.

      I wonder if that is the reason so few leave a comment.

  12. Richard, all comments and opinions are welcome. The goal is to educate/inform the people. There are people who are working really hard to bring forth the truth whether some people like the info or not. It’s the “dragging down” of these researchers by people who sit back and complain that can create a problem. Many groups are trying things to “fix” the problems…no need to publicly knock groups we may not fully agree with. It just hurts the cause.

    • Comments and opinions are welcome as long as in your opinion they are not “dragging down the researchers”?

      If groups are trying to “fix’ the problems and someone happens to disagree with their method, that should not be expressed publicly, so where do I send these welcome comments and opinions?

      My dog is not interested.

      Do you have a private web site for these welcome comments and opinions you classify as knocking groups I’m not in agreement with?

      Are you only interested in educating and informing those that agree with you?

      My comment and opinion welcome or not for the day is, In my opinion forming a non-profit corp. to go after the govt. the same govt. you have to get permission from to form said corp. is a mistake the people forming this corp. should not recruit the people to sign-on, it becomes another contract between the signer and the STATE
      further making the signer “A STATE SUBJECT”, I came to this conclusion from study of other STATE permissions slips and reading the Non Profit Corporation Act.

      If you haven’t read the above mentioned ACT you should before allowing or promoting any recruiting on this public web site.

      Hope this writing is understandable.

  13. Hi!

    Here is a situation that happened recently “in my world.”

    A woman that I have known for years and years went to court recently with her daughter. This daughter now sits in jail as I write this.

    Did this woman and her daughter know about the corrupt court system here in Maine?

    No, they don’t.

    They don’t have a clue.

    Neither of them knew that the daughter’s chances of winning was highly unlikely but did.

    The daughter now sits in jail for her ignorance.

    It is too bad and sad.

    I grieve for these two women.

    Furthermore, this woman and I attend an organizational luncheon once a month but did I say anything to her about the corrupt court system here in Maine?

    No, I did not.

    Why is that?

    Because I don’t use luncheon situations to “educate” anyone.

    I go there to enjoy myself.

    Maybe I will see her in a store or on the sidewalk and “plant a seed” about the corrupt court system here in Maine.

    If she is curious enough and receptive to what I share, she may ask questions.

    I can refer her to this blog, too.

    Thank you!

    Lise from Maine

    • so Lise are you saying you didn’t help or try to help this young lady because you didn’t want to ruin your lunch? and we are to believe your interested in educating and helping people.
      This gets more bizarre with every comment.

      • It seems no answer is forthcoming to my reply, a couple days ago a friend of mine and I were discussing Lise’s failure to try to help these two ladies “at a luncheon date”, he made a comment that I found interesting ” he wondered if Lise sold or tried to sell her book at one of these luncheons”, I thought that a good question, well did you?
        He reads this site and will supply his name if he so chooses.

      • She already answered your question. Unfortunately, it’s “after the fact” for the daughter anyway.

  14. Hi!

    Mistake found: Should say “but I did.”

    Lise from Maine

  15. Hi!

    For anyone’s information I write “short” or “shorter” comments because some people do not like to read lengthy explanations so breaking it up helps.

    Thank you!

    Lise from Maine

  16. Hi to all on this blog:

    I did NOT attend that organization and attempt to sell my book.

    As a matter of fact, I don’t even mention it. I go there to enjoy myself ONLY.

    I NEVER EVER attempted to “make money” by selling my book. I have other ways of making a living.

    I knew “from the beginning” that I would probably NOT make any money from its publication. Most self-published authors usually don’t make any money. It is very costly to self-publish.

    And I have NOT made any money from it to this day. None at all.

    That book cost me thousands and thousand of dollars to publish, and I have yet to get back that money that I put into it.

    I had it published “solely” to educate some of the people, and some people do NOT even care about the subject matter, and that is fine with me.

    I thought that the people of Maine deserved to know what happened to our constitutional republic.

    When asked, I always recommend that my book is much cheaper at barnesandnoble.com and amazon.com.

    I could care less about making money from the book, and if I do, then so be it.

    I ONLY desire to educate those who want to be educated.

    Thank you!

    Lise from Maine

    • Thanks so much for your hard work. You are truly appreciated.

  17. Hi!

    My book was written and published to educate those in other states, too, since they could use it as a reference guide in order to investigate what has happened in their own state.

    All states today are “territories” of the United States, and federal law supersede state laws.

    All fraud and treason against the people.

    Only those, who will take the time and expand their energy to investigate their own state statutes, will more likely discover plenty of fraud and treason and when their state got overthrown. Some people do not desire to investigate anything.

    All states have been overthrown.

    Maine was overthrown in 1876.

    Thank you!

    Lise from Maine

  18. Has the BAR CARD holding GOWNED CLOWN, self admitted criminal
    been arrested yet?
    I haven’t heard any more about this criminal that is seemingly still walking among us, has the non-profit corp. leaders been making demands on the PUBLIC SERVANTS in DISGUSTA demanding to see justice done?
    Is this disgusting self admitted criminal still dispensing what passes for JUSTICE (JOKE) IN THIS STATE from the bench?
    Where is the self proclaimed constitutional governor? is he protecting WE THE PEOPLE from this criminal or is he still protecting THIS STATE at all costs.
    Makes one want to yell “BEAM ME UP SCOTTY” there’s no intelligent life down here!!
    I hope this is punctuated properly and understandable.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: