Have You Been Harmed By Maine’s Judicial System?

An Open Forum Community Meeting was held on Friday, May 2, 2014 in South Portland regarding Maine’s Courts particularly, but not exclusive to, Maine’s Family Courts and GAL Oversight.

Lori Handrahan organized Friday’s meeting as a response to Scott Dolan’s article in the PPH “Maine attorney general enters fray over divorce case.” Lori states that the article “made it look like I was the only one in the entire State of Maine who had problem with Judge Jeffrey Moskowitz.” The State of Maine was quoted in that article as saying there has never been a complaint against Moskowitz, or any other judge. Contrary to this statement, there have been complaints filed against other judges.

A real problem exists when the Senate chair of the Judiciary Committee, Linda Valentino, D-Saco, disagrees that legislators should be inquiring about judges’ qualifications.  The Judiciary Committee members’ task is to hear public testimony as to the honesty, integrity and qualifications of attorneys who are nominated by Governor LePage to be appointed and confirmed as Judges.

It is time for Maine people to see how the Legislators conduct their own actions of ignoring public presentations of written evidence and how they believe in their own favoritism of fellow legislators and Lawyers. Read more HERE.

Invited to attend this meeting, in order to learn, first hand, what is going on in Maine’s Courts were Governor Paul LePage, Mary Ann Lynch, Esq., Director of court information. A.G. Janet Mills, Linda Valentio, Senate Chair of the Judiciary Committee and many legislators were cc’d the invitation to attend. Only two legislators attended, Senator David Dutremble and Rep. Lisa Villa.

Judge Moskowitz is not the only judge who has violated the Rule of Law or constitutional rights of victims. He is not the only judge who has irreparably harmed and totally devastated lives and families. This is no surprise to us as we have run into roadblocks at every level in seeking accountability. Augusta has all of its “bases” covered…to include the courtrooms… with its “revolving door policy.” All doors to remedy injustices are closed!

Are Judges engaging in conduct prejudicial to the effective and expeditious administration of the business of the courts, inconsistent with constitutional requirements, statutes, rules of court, decisional law, and common sense and in non-compliance with the Code of judicial and ethical conduct? Is there a continuous pattern of improper activity, breach of duty, intentional harm upon litigants, official oppression and racketeering?

MAINE LAW DEFINING ’OFFICIAL OPPRESSION’: A person is guilty of official oppression if, being a public servant and acting with the intention to benefit himself or another or to harm another, he knowingly commits an unauthorized act which purports to be an act of his office, or knowingly refrains from performing a duty imposed on him by law or clearly inherent in the nature of his office.”

The Obstruction of Justice within Maine’s court system, to include key players involved in protecting Maine judges, attorneys, prosecutors, commands an investigation and accountability. This is long overdue. It is time for a probe of judicial/official misconduct ……and perhaps an audit too!

Pursuant to Title 4: Judiciary, Chapter 1 § 1 administrative responsibilities of the court and the Chief Justice, the Chief Justice, as the head of the judicial branch, shall, in accordance with the rules, regulations and orders of the Supreme Judicial Court, be responsible for the efficient operation of the judicial branch and for the expeditious dispatch of litigation therein and for the proper conduct of business in all courts and the prompt and proper administration of justice.

Pursuant to Title 4, Chapter 1 § 17, duties as State Court Administrator include, but are not limited to, the study of operation, condition of business, practice and procedure of the Judicial Department; making recommendations for the efficient administration of justice; examinations of the status of dockets of all courts so as to determine cases and other judicial business that have been unduly delayed; investigating complaints with respect to the operation of the courts.

Like Lori, there are many who know that such an investigation will not be commenced by Maine’s Attorney General, Maine’s US Attorney General, nor be initiated by our state legislators.

18 USC § 4
Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

In 2008, the Justice Department announced an agreement with administrative officials of the Maine judiciary which resolved an investigation of a complaint alleging that the Maine judicial branch, which receives federal funding,was not in compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968. However, under the terms of the agreement, the Justice Department monitored Maine’s compliance for a period of two years. Maine courts are still in non-compliance with Federal law and continue to accept federal funding. The Maine Supreme Court continually upholds lower court decisions which violate the rights of the people. Another investigation is in order.

The pattern of CORRUPTION AND CONFLICT OF INTEREST PERMEATES WITHIN Maine’s judicial system, click here.

When official corruption is not “nipped in the bud”, it yields greater exposure. Lori is in contact with Federal officials. Any victim of Maine’s judicial/governmental system, with documented evidence, is being requested by Lori to submit their evidence to the following agents with whom she is in contact with:  Kevin.Ohlson@usdoj.org, James.Comey@ic.fbi.gov. Inform these two people at DOJ  as to the crimes committed against you, or your family. Too many people have suffered at the hands of (in)justice whether it be the unlawful confiscation of your property, business, livelihoods, homes, children, animals, etc.  The revealing of a pattern of official oppression/obstruction of justice/violations of protected rights will yield results for victims on this state of Maine. It is crystal clear that there is more behind this “curtain” than meets the eye. It’s more than unfortunate that Maine’s elected officials/law enforcement chose to “turn a deaf ear.” It’s a public scandal.

Upholding the “Supreme Law of the State” is not a political, nor party, issue.  Years of attempts have been made to contact and connect with Maine’s Senators, Representatives, and law enforcement to investigate evidence of crimes committed against the people, to no avail. However, most recently, some Maine representatives have seen the light and with their help, we can make a positive change within Maine’s governmental and judicial systems. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!

A door of opportunity has opened for those who seek the justice that Maine fails to uphold. You have an opportunity to stand up and be heard. Meanwhile, legislators with a heart, conscience, and common sense will be pursued to help restore our judicial system and our republic.

Related:  Request for meeting with state legislators, HERE, HERE.

Corruption on Maine has been ongoing for years…..and continues today. Some of the same people mentioned on this tape are still in positions of power today.  MOST POWERFUL, REVEALING VIDEO BY TOM DUNN, view HERE.


The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://unmasker4maine.wordpress.com/2014/05/05/have-you-been-harmed-by-maines-judicial-system/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

45 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. Hi!

    First of all, there aren’t any genuine, constitutional judges operating here in Maine as NONE of the “fake” judges otherwise known as “administrators” possess a commission.

    A commission is a document under seal of the State of Maine (original) as stated in Article IX, Section 3 that provides a genuine, constitutional judge with a “title,” for example, Chief Justice and also provides this judge with a public office.

    Without it he is NOT a public officer operating in a public office. He is nothing more than a “mere” employee and has no immunity. In other words, he is an impostor and committing fraud against the people.

    The commission as mentioned in Article IX, Section 3 comprises 4 components: (1) it must in the name of the State, (2) it must be signed by the Governor, (3) it must be attested by the Secretary or his deputy, and (4) it must have the seal affixed to it.

    I have already addressed the definitions of a commission on this forum plus there is a copy Justice Cornish’s commission on this blog, too. Type in Lise from Maine in the search box to view these documents and more.

    See also “fake” judge Robert E. Mullen’s certificate on this forum which is NOT a commission and does not “vest an office,” a public office.

    The original constitution of the State of Maine nor the “statutory” constitution say anything about a “certificate.”

    All for now.

    Thank you!

    Lise from Maine

    • We’re trying to educate the people on this too. Judges are not upholding whichever constitution (original 1820 or “statutory”) they (don’t) understand. They must, however, understand right from wrong. The judicial system is not only broken, it’s corrupt…like the rest of the system. Since officials didn’t want to listen to the people, hopefully, they will have to listen to “outsiders.” They must be held accountable! The cover ups must end!

    • NOW !!! My case is the one where retired Donald Marden Judge said ” I don’t chew my cabbage twice” and in Janet Mills home town Farmington . Now my case is in First Circuit Court to Appeals in Boston and I so desperately need help – guidance , interpretation, ideas, money, document preparation. I sued Donald Marden , the clerk of of Franklin County and Joe O’Dponnell and as well as The County. O;Donnell drew up a deed and sent it to the clerk Vickie Hardy along with MY social security number. They then recorded the deed taking my property it . I notified the Sheriff in Franklin and Kennebec County it is Identity Thief and they failed to act.
      Ofcourse, I notified Janet Mills , it is her duty to protect the citizens of Maine, but she refused to Arrest them for their felony . Instead the AG’s office with Mr. Knowlton is representing Judge
      Marden and the other named defendants in US District court .
      [ Mr. Knowlton was the commentator on the case with F.Lee Bailey ]. I URGENTLY need all types of help , documents preparation, researchers , etc. The fee’s are exorbitant, $400. for US District to file lawsuit against judge and and his co-conspirators and $500. at First Circuit of Appeals in Boston. This is a case of judicial accountability and if people want to see change in Maine then this case must be out in the publics eye and people helping to make the corruption stop. This case must be WON !!! When folks become aware of how to do it and that judges are under the same constitution and when they are fined , sanctioned for violating laws and court proceedings then things will begin to change . The alternative is the continued stealing of people rights and property
      and all the evils we know they perform.
      -beverlyal@yahoo.com PLEASE POST !

      Hi Lise, I did go looking 4 your email, lost in my miles of emails. Has your book come out yet ? Whats up !

      • Did you read the entire post? Did you see Lori’s suggestion?

      • yes, I read the whole post and will look again ?  


  2. Hi!

    In addition, there are NO county courts, within and for the county (local control). These “fake” courts are all “state-wide” courts acting FOR THE STATE ONLY.

    These “administrators” enforce the “will” of the state ONLY.

    These “fake” judges have no delegation of authority to decide any causes which they do most of the time. That is the job of the trial by jury by the people and not a trial by jury of the government (since 1935).

    What are your chances of winning in these fake courts with fake judges, and fake trial by juries selected by the government?

    Slim to none.

    Thank you!

    Lise from Maine

  3. Hi!

    Furthermore, what is this state operating today?

    A fake, codified (roman civil law as opposed to the common law) state and not a genuine, constitutional (original) State.

    Everything is fake.

    All fraud and treason.

    Thank you!

    Lise from Maine

  4. Hi Beverly,

    You can ask Dottie for my email.

    Thank you!

    Lise from Maine

    • Lise said, I should ask you for her email, thank you !


  5. Hi!

    I address issues regarding our “fake” courts with “fake” judges from a different angle as I am a researcher, and next month will make seven (7) years that I have been investigating the fraud and treason against the people here in Maine.

    The meeting that was held last week is a great beginning process and hope it continues. Issues raised there were from a very different angle than mine which is good.

    The more angles presented, the better. Eventually more and more people will have their eyes opened to what is really going on.

    For those who were at the meeting. Congratulations!

    A great beginning!

    Keep it up!

    Thank you!

    Lise from Maine

    • Reply, that is why this story has too go out too…  But  in absolute honesty, nothing will happen for the betterment of anyone – unless people  get together…  [  that is  a FACT  ] soon I go to the mts. myself. I am wicked sick with cold today ….. beverly


      • The only way the word will get out is to SHARE these posts….

  6. Hi Beverly and others,

    What do you expect from “this codified state” (statutory constitution with NO amendments incorporated into it – see original Article X, Section 4) and its officials which can ONLY operate in fraud and treason?

    It most certainly cannot operate constitutionally (original) and uphold the rights of the people.

    The codified state operates “to serve” its own needs and wants. It’s all about “it” and not the people.

    Thank you!

    Lise from Maine

    • Well, I  am not in Maine regarding one case , it is in  First Circuit Court  of Appeals in boston and it has to do with their reviewing the judges decision… I have worked damn hard to get it there and there are other places folks can go  to report judges… so i know  people interested or will be interested in this. please circulate. thank you , beverly  what happened to your book ? Lise 


  7. Hi!

    More education.

    In 1963 the entire judicial power was eliminated and “brought back” by amendment (I believe that this document is on this forum, and if not, then I can send it to Dottie to place here).

    What was the purpose of doing this?

    To tell you the truth I really don’t know but for whatever reason(s) it was NOT to the people’s advantage and benefit.

    Was this 1963 “pretend” law the “corporate” part of the fake judicial state-wide courts with “fake” judges operating within them and fake juries?

    I can only speculate at this point as I really don’t know why the legislature did this with the assistance of the “fake” electors (see the voter application form at your city/town/plantation hall to view another piece of fraud and treason).

    Who are the voters?

    They are citizens of the United States of America and NOT a 14th amendment citizen as a 14th amendment citizen is called a “citizen of the United States.”

    Big distinction!

    Is this the “new world order” citizen as mentioned on the voter application form?


    What are you declaring yourself as when you place a “check mark” on this voter application form?

    Think about this.

    What I have discovered over the years is layer upon layer upon layer of fraud and treason against the people which is how most of the people can get “lost” if they don’t keep up with the different pieces of the puzzle.

    It is overwhelming to say the least but it must be studied.

    I have done my best to show the people the different pieces of the puzzle, and there is much more to learn – almost 200 years of material.

    All for now.

    Thank you!

    Would love to read your comments as I appreciate them.

    Lise from Maine

  8. Hi!

    It’s coming.

    Lise from Maine

    • make  certain  to  let  me  know  !


  9. Hi Beverly,

    I will.

    Lise from Maine

  10. you’re not going to win instate courts . sue them in federal court . title 18 and 42 . theres alot of information to help you ; national liberty alliance . start reading . there is a lot .

  11. there is alot of information about just about everything we are having prolems with in this country .

  12. join the national liberty alliance . takes just a few minites

  13. Hi!

    What is the National Liberty Alliance? Can you explain?

    First of all, there aren’t any genuine, constitutional, Article III courts operating in these United States.

    The “administrative” courts at the federal level are “just as” crooked as the “administrative” state-wide courts.

    Most people lose there, too, and wonder why.

    That is all they are “just” administrative and not constitutional.

    Roosevelt’s New Deal?

    People need to “wake up” to this fact.

    I have now spent over 8 years investigating the fraud and treason here in Maine, and I continue to learn something each week or so.

    Both the state and federal governments view us, the people, as slaves on their plantations, and we “own” nothing.

    It just appears as if we do. “Appearance” is not the real thing.

    I have done everything I can to educate the people by using this blog and writing my book.

    Wake up, folks!

    Thank you!

    Lise from Maine

    • Lise,  What we need is court watchers –  maine people  are so isolated things will never change… Do you know anything about carol going back to jail for having animals. ? 

      From: The Unmasking of Maine….and Beyond To: beverlyal@yahoo.com Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 10:17 AM Subject: [New comment] Have You Been Harmed By Maine’s Judicial System? #yiv0916794132 a:hover {color:red;}#yiv0916794132 a {text-decoration:none;color:#0088cc;}#yiv0916794132 a.yiv0916794132primaryactionlink:link, #yiv0916794132 a.yiv0916794132primaryactionlink:visited {background-color:#2585B2;color:#fff;}#yiv0916794132 a.yiv0916794132primaryactionlink:hover, #yiv0916794132 a.yiv0916794132primaryactionlink:active {background-color:#11729E;color:#fff;}#yiv0916794132 WordPress.com Lise from Maine commented: “Hi!What is the National Liberty Alliance? Can you explain?First of all, there aren’t any genuine, constitutional, Article III courts operating in these United States.The “administrative” courts at the federal level are “just as” crooked as th” | |

  14. Hi!

    If you don’t believe me about the crooked courts at the federal level, then read the book called “From Jailer to Jailed” by Bernard Kerik.

    Read what happened to this once very, very, very “powerful” guy in federal court which was in reality “administrative” ONLY but he was jailed anyways. All fraud and treason.

    I read the book twice in 4 days.

    It is quite a revelation!

    Mr. Kerik was “railroaded” by the “fake” judge and the prosecutors. He was shocked to say the least, and it was a great eye-opener for him. He is now labeled as a felon and can never own a gun again. Who will hire him as a felon?

    All fraud and treason once again.

    Even those with labels of misdemeanor charges can’t get hired for many of them. If they do in many cases, these jobs are just menial ones and don’t pay much.

    This was a great, great eye-opener for Mr. Kerik but he also needs to wake up to other realities such as 9-11 and more.

    He doesn’t get it yet.

    Maybe by reading this book more people will wake up to the reality that there aren’t any genuine, constitutional courts operating in this country.

    Happy reading!

    Thank you!

    Lise from Maine

  15. Hi!

    Additionally, Mr. Kerik was also “railroaded” in the state court (New York), too.

    This is where his “troubles” began and escalated to the federal level which landed him in prison eventually.

    Very few people win in state courts and at the federal level, too.

    Understand this, folks!

    In the event that you land in court for whatever reason, learn what these courts are and are not BEFORE you get there.

    Be prepared.

    Most people think that they will win in these “fake” courts, but that is very, very rare, if at all. Most believe that they will receive a remedy in these “fake” courts but that is not so for the most part.

    Read and learn what happened to Mr. Kerik, and it may serve as a great eye-opener for you.

    Thank you!

    Lise from Maine

  16. Hi!

    First of all, before we have court watchers, people (some) need to understand what they are “watching” and “hearing.”

    We also need a “platform” to report what we saw and heard and explain what was “wrong” and “unlawful.”

    This is exposure of the fraud and treason.

    Exposing the criminals is the name of the game, and they won’t like it.

    Thank you!

    Lise from Maine

    • I don’t agree , people intimidate the powers that be and they may not all know what is right or wrong, as long as they document it… we cannot even get people to come together to help each other so how on earth would  a platform come too be.  I don’t feel that we can expect people to know right from wrong… right away only from  experience.  The court watchers could hand in there report at the end  – people is what is needed more than  a platform, I have gone it EXCLUSIVELY  alone and it  has been  hell…. Not one person to talk too in maine !   We can’t even get it together  to talk those of us who know a tiny bit of law { this after years}.   I think flyers in court houses for people to contact other that the people in the network, say ” the bar assoc. or the corrupt hud organization.”  I am angry about the lack of carrying for most Maine people… very angry !But enough I have a busy day… hope all is well with you  ! beverly From: The Unmasking of Maine….and Beyond To: beverlyal@yahoo.com Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 10:58 AM Subject: [New comment] Have You Been Harmed By Maine’s Judicial System? #yiv6209057662 a:hover {color:red;}#yiv6209057662 a {text-decoration:none;color:#0088cc;}#yiv6209057662 a.yiv6209057662primaryactionlink:link, #yiv6209057662 a.yiv6209057662primaryactionlink:visited {background-color:#2585B2;color:#fff;}#yiv6209057662 a.yiv6209057662primaryactionlink:hover, #yiv6209057662 a.yiv6209057662primaryactionlink:active {background-color:#11729E;color:#fff;}#yiv6209057662 WordPress.com Lise from Maine commented: “Hi!First of all, before we have court watchers, people (some) need to understand what they are “watching” and “hearing.”We also need a “platform” to report what we saw and heard and explain what was “wrong” and “unlawful.” This is exposure of ” | |

  17. I am a victim of the belfast court. I was charged with driving with out a license and insurance. But I have a valid license and current insurance. I brought proof of both to court with me and the judge acted like she could not hear me. I was found guilty on both charges and the judge, Patricia G. Worth. Knew I was not guilty. and I was charged twice for each charge. the fines came out to be $ 884.00 . My appeal was denied. I turned to governers office after getting no help from the committee of judicial responsibility and so far they are still trying to bog me down with red tape and paperwork. Is there anything I can do?

  18. I would like to see this info get into more readers hands. Is there some way to post this information in a lot more places ? I know there are many people who think the courts are ( JUST) courts and we know they are not. I think this is very important to get this information spread all over and all the time like flea’s in august.

  19. Hi!

    Can you provide more information regarding your charges?

    How did you land in court to begin with if you have a valid driver’s license and valid insurance?

    None of this makes any sense.

    Did you have a trial by jury (Article 1, Section 6 and 20 of the Constitution of the State of Maine) or did the “fake” judge decide that you are guilty? If she did decide that you are guilty, then she violated your constitution “secured” rights to a jury.

    It would NOT surprise me if you got screwed by the “Administrative” Belfast so-called court.

    Thank you!

    Lise from Maine

  20. I got charged with no license from Merl Reed. even know I had a drivers license and insurance. Of course I had my insurance company fax the document to the state and I had my license. and the so called judge patricia worthless completely ignored me and she also charged me twice for both charges !!! I was not alloud to say anything. they ignored my 6th amendment right and any questions i asked. it was not a trial like it was supposed to be,…it was a sentencing !!! No due process of any kind, all rights were completely ignored. I am sending them the ucc 1-308 document that is supposed tobe the remedy for the ucc laws and telling them I will not appear in there corrupt court and if they want to send there gunmen after me for unpaid fines which are victimless ! that I have A 2nd amendment right to protect myself from tryanny. If I cant live free then they can kill me but I will not be put in a cage cause I cant or wont pay there extortion ! steven lamperta

  21. I would like to talk to you by phone if possible. I have some questions and may be able to help each other. I study constitution and the ucc every day. I am disabled an have nothing else to do…

  22. Oh im sorry, to answer your question, No I didnt ask for a jury trial. I was able to very easily prove to the court that they had no jurisdiction whatsoever. They would not answer my question I had for them. I told them I would not enter a plea untill they admitted to what jurisdiction they was applying to my case. and ofcourse they violated all rights

  23. The clearest example of judicial and law enforcement wrongdoing in Maine is likely my own case described in detail (with all the original evidence, documents and testimony included) in a book I published in 2015. It is available at Amazon (540 pp and $1.99 on Kindle). It is titled: “RAILROADED TO THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY: A Conspiracy in Maine” and proves beyond any doubt that seven individuals led by Cumberland County DA Stephanie Anderson altered documents, committed perjury and subornation of perjury, procured a search warrant maliciously, tampered with public records, offered bogus so-called expert testimony and denied me due process under law after a conviction in 2006. In support of Tony Sanborn, who served over a quarter of a century in Maine State prison and is having a hearing regarding a post-conviction application for a new trial, I will be outside the Cumberland Courthouse and Government Center in downtown Portland on the morning that hearing begins. I’ll be handing out flyers listing the various entities (including this blog) who have expressed their frustration at the State of Maine’s judicial and law enforcement wall of silence. Keep up with this needed work.

    • Dottie or whoever – why did you send me this   I did try and  talk with you last week or so, beverly

      From: The Unmasking of Maine….and Beyond To: beverlyal@yahoo.com Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 9:15 PM Subject: [New comment] Have You Been Harmed By Maine’s Judicial System? #yiv0781014466 a:hover {color:red;}#yiv0781014466 a {text-decoration:none;color:#0088cc;}#yiv0781014466 a.yiv0781014466primaryactionlink:link, #yiv0781014466 a.yiv0781014466primaryactionlink:visited {background-color:#2585B2;color:#fff;}#yiv0781014466 a.yiv0781014466primaryactionlink:hover, #yiv0781014466 a.yiv0781014466primaryactionlink:active {background-color:#11729E;color:#fff;}#yiv0781014466 WordPress.com Jim Logan commented: “The clearest example of judicial and law enforcement wrongdoing in Maine is likely my own case described in detail (with all the original evidence, documents and testimony included) in a book I published in 2015. It is available at Amazon (540 pp and $1.9” | |

      • Beverly, you receive these posts because you are on the e-mail list. If you do not wish to receive these posts, let us know and we will remove your name.

  24. Hi Jim,

    I just learned of your book a day or so ago, and ordered it today, October 1, 2017.

    I am eager to read it.

    Thank you!

    Lise from Maine

  25. As I stated in an earlier post, I showed up at the Cumberland County Courthouse and Government Center on October 10th, 2017, at the start of Tony Sanborn’s hearing regarding his murder conviction. Last summer I conducted 30 Protest Walks on the sidewalks surrounding that courthouse while holding a sign and dressed in a prison costume, passing out hundreds of flyers. On October 10th, dressed in a three-piece suit, I tried to hand out flyers regarding the Sanborn hearing and was informed at 10:20 am by Sgt. Jon D. LeRoger, a State Marshall with the Judicial Branch, that if I did not cross the street to hand out the flyers I would be arrested. When I asked Sgt. LeRoger why he never complained about my passing out flyers all last year, he told me to my face that he had never noticed my walking around the building before – – an obvious lie. Being the sole care provider for my 98-year-old Mom, I could not risk arrest at that time but am presently considering testing what Sgt. LeRoger claims is the law – – that the courthouse sidewalk is not a public space.

  26. Hi!

    Good for you!

    Testing is great.

    Who “owns” the courthouse? The City? The State? The County?


    Similarly, who “owns” the sidewalks? The City? The State? The County?


    Are they both for “public” use or “private” use?

    Let us know what you discover.

    Lise from Maine

  27. After six phone calls over three days to the legal department of the City of Portland, I finally got the answer as to whether the Marshals were acting properly in threatening me with arrest if I continued to hand out flyers about the Tony Sanborn case outside the Cumberland County Courthouse and Government Center on October 10, 2017. Here is the email I received from Portland’s legal department:

    Anne Torregrossa
    To Logan8389@yahoo.com

    Mr. Logan,

    Nancy relayed your messages regarding your interactions with the superior court marshals recently. It does appear that the sidewalk outside the courthouse is a City sidewalk and does not belong to the County. Generally speaking, the City does not regulate the distribution of flyers on City property.

    I hope that answers your questions.

    Anne M. Torregrossa
    Associate Corporation Counsel
    City of Portland
    389 Congress Street, Room 211
    Portland, Maine 04101

    Folks, what my encounter with Marshals Sgt.Jon D. LeRoger and Sullivan Rizzo amounted to was a successful attempt at “prior restraint,” a government entity preventing free expression. I am now re-writing (and will hand out this coming week) the flyers and will focus on how difficult a task it is to expose wrong-doing by law enforcement and judicial officials when the automatic response is for them to shut down dialogue even if threats are required, as Marshals LeRoger and Rizzo pulled on me, a 77-year-old Honorably Discharged U.S. Army veteran. As I’ve already stated, my book portrays exactly how a conspiracy to convict unfolds even though the Bad Actors don’t have to gather together to hatch the plot. Like LeRoger and Rizzo, all they have to do is threaten and lie.

  28. Hi!

    Good for you for pursuing the matter of the sidewalk incident.

    Controlling free speech is happening all over the country especially on the college campus.

    Most people do NOT realize that we do NOT have any constitutional courts here in Maine.

    “Fake” judges, “fake” courts and “fake” trial by juries of “his” peers are specifically designed for people to lose and most do.

    I wrote a book on this and more in 2014.

    Thank you!

    Lise from Maine

    • lise, I will be in mine later tonight and I need to talk with you… beverly

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: