Senator Colleen Lachowicz (Kennebec) Sponsors “Resolve” To Amend The Constitution of the State of Maine

Updated 1-29-14

Courtesy of Lise from Maine

“Hi Everyone!

Go to www.mainelegislature.org and in the upper right hand corner type in LD 1564 and see what the fraudulent 1875 resolve accomplished (went into effect in 1876 – one hundred years after the American Revolution – this is NO accident).

This shows that the constitution is ONLY a “statutory” constitution. The 2003 constitution is Title 97, and I do have to wonder if the 2013 one will be Title 98.

We shall see.

This new constitution and some prior ones operate under the “roman civil law” of scholars and the elitists (they are knowledgeable, and we are not according to them) as opposed to the people’s law, the common law.

This is fraud and treason since the legislature and the supreme judicial court (both fakes nowadays) are “suppose” to operate “underneath” it, and instead they both operate “above” it.

What more proof do we need?

What this says overall and over time:

1. There isn’t any genuine, lawful “state” constitution operating by the common law principles.

2. No county courts, within and for the county (local control).

3. No commissioned judges

4. No Jurors selected by the people (local control) since 1935.

All of this is explained in my book.

Isn’t this nice?

Is it any wonder why very few, if any, who enter “their” private courts win? They are “rigged” against the people so most people lose, and the “fake” judge will have them for lunch.

Some knowledgeable people, who take the time to study this fraud and treason, can challenge these “fake” judges and are able to “walk out” without being sent to jail, etc.

This is very rare, indeed.

Can’t learn this information the “night before” court and be able to withstand the
“trickery” that these fake judges pull.

It is a “high” risk to walk into these “fake” courts with “fake” judges.

All for now.

Thank you!”

Lise

LD 1564 

Summary of LD 1564
“Resolve, Approving the 2013 Draft and Arrangement of the Constitution of Maine Made by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Judicial Court and Providing for Its Publication and Distribution”

Sponsor of the Resolve Sen. Colleen Lachowicz, click here.
On the LD 1564 web page you will find the following:

Actions: 
6/18/2013 Senate Reported by Senator LACHOWICZ for the Chief Justice of the Supreme Judicial Court pursuant to the Constitution of Maine, Article X, Section 6.
Report READ and ACCEPTED.
Under suspension of the Rules, READ TWICE and PASSED TO BE ENGROSSED.
Ordered sent down forthwith for concurrence.
6/18/2013 House Report was READ and ACCEPTED.
Under suspension of the rules and WITHOUT REFERENCE to a Committee, the Resolve was READ TWICE andPASSED TO BE ENGROSSED.
In concurrence. ORDERED SENT FORTHWITH.
6/18/2013 House FINALLY PASSED.
Sent for concurrence. ORDERED SENT FORTHWITH.
6/18/2013 Senate FINALLY PASSED – Emergency – 2/3 Elected Required, in concurrence.

Roll calls
No Senate roll-calls were found.

No House roll-calls were found.

Committee
Latest Committee Report: Not Reported Out

No public hearings or work sessions have been listed for this bill.

Amendments
No amendments found.

Title & Section
None listed at this time.

Related: Article X, Section 4 of the Constitution of the State of Maine, click here.

Unless Senator Colleen Lachowicz educates herself, Kennebec….it’s time to send her home! Her unlawful action has affected all Mainers.

Advertisements
Published in: on January 27, 2014 at 8:55 pm  Comments (28)  

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://unmasker4maine.wordpress.com/2014/01/27/senator-colleen-lachowicz-kennebec-sponsors-resolve-to-amend-the-constitution-of-the-state-of-maine/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

28 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. Hi!

    Why aren’t the “electors” voting on this resolve (see Article x, section 4 of the original Constitution of the State of Maine)?

    Additionally, by what authority can the supreme judicial court create a different constitution?

    None whatsoever.

    The constitution is “changed” by amendment, and the “electors” must vote on it.

    By what authority can the legislature approve or disapprove the said constitution?

    None at all.

    Both the supreme judicial court and the legislature are suppose to operate “underneath” the constitution and not “above” it by creating and approving/disapproving it.

    By what authority can any senator “sponsor” this fraudulent resolve?

    None at all.

    This is fraud and treason against the people of Maine.

    Thank you!

    Lise from Maine

  2. Hi!

    Senator Lachowicz is a first term senator.

    How did she decide or get chosen to sponsor this fraudulent resolve?

    Aren’t we all told that “not knowing the law” is NO excuse?

    Then this applies to her, too.

    Thank you!

    Lise from Maine

    • I don’t know why she was chosen to sponsor this…she certainly didn’t come up with this on her own. But the added info….no roll calls, no committee report, no public hearing….more than suspicious! More like criminal! Sounds like Chief Saufley is up to something…..again!

  3. She needs to be arrested! Of, course we know that won’t happen. She needs to be exposed by mass e-mails to all Reps and Senators!

    • People need to take notice and speak up!

  4. Hi!

    I find it absolutely amazing that ONLY one person has a comment on this fraud and treason.

    No comments means end of conversation.

    Is this what people want?

    Thank you!

    Lise from Maine

  5. I have a comment! if we the people could get our collective sh!! together and warn the inhabitants of disgusta that are worth salvaging to move out then barricade it so the political class could neither come or go wait for them to eat each other (should not take long) then we the people could move back in set up a very limited gov. in the common law venue no more than 16 people meeting no more than 2 weeks a year change these people every 2 years (no pay).
    Also run all lawyers over to London where their loyalty lies.
    And we the people still would have to pay strict attention at all times!!!

  6. The added updates to this blog are more than infuriating! Lise, will nullifying the 1875 Resolve bring things back to where they should be?Certain legislators have been made aware of this.

  7. TREASON BEYOND TREASON!

  8. Hi!

    The 1875 fraudulent resolve is NOT actual lawful law to begin with.

    Additionally, why were the “rules” suspended regarding LD 1564, the “recodification” of the constitution?

    Thank you!

    Lise from Maine

  9. Our original Maine Constitution has been decimated with over 160 amendments since its inception. For an interlinear view of original and current, see: http://www.fortfairfieldjournal.com/mpl_maineconstI.htm

    One of my projects is to research and compose the original text of all amendments online one day. I have original Maine Statute books to get me to about the first 25 or so, then I’ll have to go to August for the rest, I guess.

    David Deschesne
    Editor/Publisher,
    Fort Fairfield Journal
    252 Main Street
    Fort Fairfield, Maine 04742
    http://www.fortfairfieldjournal.com

  10. Hi!

    Here is what Article X, Section 4 states in the “original” Constitution of the State of Maine.

    In Article X, Section 4 it states: “The Legislature, whenever two thirds of both houses shall deem It necessary, may propose amendments to this Constitution; and when any amendment shall be so agreed upon, a resolution shall be passed and sent to the selectmen of the several towns, and the assessors of the several plantations, empowering and directing them to notify the inhabitants of their respective towns and plantations, in the manner prescribed by law, at their next annual meetings in the month of September, to give in their votes on the question, whether such amendment shall be made; and if it shall appear that a majority of the inhabitants voting on the question are in favor of such amendment, it shall become a part (emphasis is mine) of this Constitution.”

    Nowhere does it say that the Chief Justice shall draft and arrange the Constitution, and nowhere does it say that the Legislature can approve or disapprove the said amendment.

    By what authority can the supreme judicial court create a different constitution?

    There isn’t any.

    By what authority can the legislature approve or disapprove the said constitution?

    No such authority exist.

    By what authority can any senator “sponsor” this fraudulent resolve?

    There isn’t any so, therefore, LD 1564 is repugnant to the original constitution and not lawful.

    Once the people can understand what Article X, Section 4 REALLY says and means then they will see for themselves JUST HOW repugnant LD 1564 actually is.

    Thank you!

    Lise from Maine

    • “When any amendment shall be so agreed upon” by 2/3 of both houses, then they send the proposed amendment to the people? What are the chances of them agreeing with anything that the people want? This section 4 is wrong…we shouldn’t have to go through them to decide what we want changed.

  11. Hi!

    Now read the 1875 resolve once again, and you will be able to see the fraudulent nature of this resolve.

    Nowhere does Article X, Section 4 say anything about “codifying” the constitution.

    This whole thing is absolutely crazy and unlawful.

    Thank you!

    Lise from Maine

  12. Hi!

    LD 1564 is NOT even an amendment, and the “electors” are NOT even involved.

    How nice!

    Thank you!

    Lise from Maine

  13. Hi!

    Read the actual wording of LD 1564.

    http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/bills/display_ps.asp?ld=1564&PID=1456&snum=126

    Thank you!

    Lise from Maine

  14. Hi!

    That is what the Founding Fathers agreed upon in the Constitutional Convention of 1819. My small town sent Eliphaz Chapman, Esquire to the convention.

    The people have the power to “reject” any proposed amendment as mentioned in Article x, Section 4, and they also have the right to vote in favor of any proposed amendment.

    That is their ultimate power.

    Nothing wrong with Article X, Section 4.

    Thank you!

    Lise from Maine

    • What are the chances of 2/3 agreeing to give us the right to vote?

  15. Hi!

    What is unlawful is for the people (electors) to vote on a fraudulent proposed amendment such as the 1855 resolve, the 1875 resolve, the 1907 resolve, etc.

    These are all repugnant to the Constitution of the State of Maine (original).

    The legislature does not possess any delegation of authority to send a fraudulent resolve for the electors to vote on to begin with.

    The Senators, Representatives, Governor, and the Council have a remedy and that is located in Article VI, Section 3; they can ask a “question of law” to the justices of the Supreme Judicial Court of the State of Maine.

    Public officers are presumed to know the laws and the limitation of their public offices, and if they don’t, then they can ask a “question of law” as above-noted.

    The Founding Fathers did NOT leave these public officers stranded in the event that they became “uncertain” about issues that may arise over time.

    The public officers were, indeed, provided with a remedy.

    So question remains: Did they use this remedy?

    In many cases they didn’t.

    Thank you!

    Lise from Maine

  16. Hi!

    If 2/3 of the legislature do not agree in passing a proposed amendment, then no proposed amendment goes to the electors for a vote.

    This was probably placed in the constitution to prevent “just anything” to go to the electors for a vote.

    Thank you!

    Lise from Maine

    • This is my point. What are the chances of 2/3 agreeing to send this LD – or other amendments – to the voters for our rejection of it? In this case, they agreed to pass this amongst themselves. Since 2/3 agreed, it should have come before the people. Section 4, IMO, is repugnant to the constitution.

  17. Hi!

    But LD 1564 is NOT an amendment.

    It is the “recodification” of the prior “codified” constitution.

    All fraud, of course.

    • I hear you. Is this another one of their play on words which affects the constitution? Resolve, recodification…it still amends (changes) the constitution. Nevertheless, having to seek their permission violates the process.

  18. Hi!

    Right in the “body” of LD 1564 it says “recodification.”

    Here it is:

    “STATE OF MAINE, IN THE YEAR OF OUR LORD TWO THOUSAND AND THIRTEEN, S.P. 607 – LD 1564, Resolve, Approving the 2013 Draft and Arrangement of the Constitution of Maine Made by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Judicial Court and Providing for Its Publication and Distribution:

    Emergency preamble. Whereas, acts and resolves of the Legislature do not become effective until 90 days after adjournment unless enacted as emergencies; and

    Whereas, the 2013 recodification of the Constitution of Maine has been completed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Judicial Court and submitted to the Legislature; and

    Whereas, the recodification must be made available to the public as soon as possible and before the expiration of the 90-day period; and

    Whereas, in the judgment of the Legislature, these facts create an emergency within the meaning of the Constitution of Maine and require the following legislation as immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety; now, therefore, be it

    Sec. 1. Constitution; approval of 2013 draft and arrangement,
    enrollment, distribution. Resolved: That the draft and arrangement of the Constitution of Maine, as amended, made by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Judicial Court, pursuant to the Constitution of Maine, Article X, Section 6, is approved and that the same be enrolled on parchment or other suitable material and deposited in the office of the Secretary of State; and be it further

    Sec. 2. Enrollment on durable material. Resolved: That the Secretary of State is authorized and directed to cause the Constitution of Maine, as amended and arranged, to be enrolled on parchment or other suitable material and upon final approval of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Judicial Court to attest to the correctness of that enrollment under the seal of the State; and be it further

    Sec. 3. Publication. Resolved: That the Secretary of State is authorized and directed to cause to be published in pamphlet form, subject to the approval of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Judicial Court, copies of the Constitution of Maine in such numbers as the Secretary of State determines necessary and that one copy of the pamphlet be forwarded to the municipal officers of each city and town and to the assessors of each plantation within the State.

    Emergency clause. In view of the emergency cited in the preamble, this legislation takes effect when approved.

    Fiscal Note for Bill as Engrossed with: No Amendments, Committee: Not Referred.

    Latest Committee Report: Not Reported Out, No public hearings or work sessions have been listed for this bill.

    Sponsor: Introducer: Senator LACHOWICZ of Kennebec.

    No Senate roll-calls were found.

    No House roll-calls were found.”

    Thank you!

    Lise from Maine

  19. Hi!

    Just discovered that in 1949 (L.D. 30) there was a “codification” of the constitution.

    Will be getting it from the law library soon.

    Thank you!

    Lise from Maine

  20. Make a complaint upon relief can be granted. file dec. of Indp. on the record.

  21. Where and when did the authority for re-arranging or changing the Maine Constitution originate?

    (Such a document should not be reduced to codification!)

    The point of authority granted by the “people” (Article ! Section2)
    would be the logical starting point from which to unraveli this tangled web of continued ignorant acceptance and treason.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: