“Over the past three decades I have seen up close the dedication of the law enforcement officers who protect me and my family. I have the greatest respect for their sacrifice and service. I also recognize that for many people of color their experiences with law enforcement have been different than mine. I have decided to speak out in the hope that we can come together as Americans, and through peaceful dialogue and education, achieve constructive change.
To support that effort, I am making contributions of $1 million each to two organizations, the International Association of Chiefs of Police’s newly established Institute for Community-Police Relations and the NAACP Legal Defense Fund. The Institute for Community-Police Relations’ policy and oversight work is focused on building trust and promoting best practices in community policing. My donation to the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, the nation’s oldest civil rights law organization, will support its ongoing work in support of reforms that will build trust and respect between communities and law enforcement. Although I know these contributions alone are not enough to solve the problem, I hope the resources will help both organizations make a positive difference.”
Courtesy of Charlotte Iserbyt:
Oh, dear…here we go again. I know Michael Jordan, who is a very popular, well known and upstanding American, means well. Many Americans will repeat Jordan’s call for a solution to what disingenuously appears to be a deliberately created problem to bring USA under a dictatorship of the unelected council form of government/police, known as Community Education and Community Oriented Policing System.
The totalitarian globalists are getting just what they must have to enslave all of us. The Hegelian dialectic (create problem, people scream, impose solution) is succeeding for the umpteenth time:
Couldn’t someone get through to Michael Jordan with the history of this whole community education/ policing agenda which dates back to the nineteen forties? What about sending him the 2002 article by the San Diego police detective Worts which explains the Community Oriented Policing System (COPS program)? Click here.
COMMUNITY/COMMUNIST ORIENTED POLICING, Charlotte Iserbyt, February 13, 2003, NewsWithViews.com
Guardians of Education for Maine fought community education in Maine in the seventies and wiped it out temporarily, although it is now being implemented under different labels. Check (free download at deliberatedumbingdown.com) for much info on Community Ed, Utah’s role (Dr. Donald Thomas and former Secretary of Education T. H. Bell), Montgomery County, Maryland Community Ed, 1946, Mott Foundation, Michigan, etc.
Does anyone reading this article know any one who knows Michael Jordan and could get through to him and explain the very controversial history of “community education and policing”?
Why? Since “they” have been “there” prior to the Civil War and unfortunately since then as well. “They” know the importance of not being able to vote, not having a say in their and their children’s education/futures.
President Reagan’s White House Private Sector Initiative (public/private partnerships) carved in stone the unelected community education movement which had its origins back in the nineteen forties (Mott Foundation, Michigan and Utah deeply involved) Included as one of task force members in Reagan’s Private Sector Initiative is International Association of Police, also mentioned in Jordan quote above (see bolded).
As a U.S. Department of Education liaison with The White House during the early days of this initiative this writer inquired of one of President Reagan’s political appointees whether this initiative was not corporate fascism; a politically incorrect question that resulted in someone else replacing me as Liaison with The White House.
Note: I have bolded names of groups/individuals I, personally, know have been deeply involved in promotion of communist community education ever since 1945. There are others on list, but I cannot document their involvement at moment. Community education is international. The Jean Gang architectural plan which has the Police Station in center of community (see link above) does appear to be a model for towns/cities internationally.
EARLY IN 1981 THE PRESIDENT’S TASK FORCE ON PRIVATE SECTOR INITIATIVES WAS installed at 734 Jackson Place, N.W., Washington, D.C. Membership listed on The White House letterhead read like a “Who’s Who” of individuals in government agencies, universities, tax-exempt foundations,non-governmental organizations, business, media, labor unions, and religion. Thenames of some individuals on the task force follow: William Aramony, president, United Way; William J. Baroody, Jr., president, American Enterprise Institute; Helen G. Boosalis, mayor, City of Lincoln, Nebraska; Terence Cardinal Cooke, archbishop of New York; Governor Pierre S. Dupont, Delaware; Senator David Durenberger; Luis A. Ferre, former governor of Puerto Rico; John Gardner, chairman, Independent Sector; Edward Hill, pastor, Mt. Zion Baptist Church;Michael S. Joyce, executive director, John M. Olin Foundation;Edward H. Kiernan, president,International Association of Police; Arthur Levitt, Jr., chairman, American Stock Exchange;Richard W. Lyman, president, Rockefeller Foundation; Elder Thomas S. Monson, The Mormon Church; William C. Norris, chairman and CEO, Control Data Corporation; George Romney,chairman, National Center for Citizen Involvement; C. William Verity, Jr., chairman, ArmcoSteel, Inc.; Jeri J. Winger, first vice president, General Federation of Women’s Clubs; ThomasH. Wyman, president, CBS, Inc.; and William S. White, president, C.S. Mott Foundation.
This un-American concept of partnerships between public and private sector has been readily accepted by our elected officials who ignore its roots in socialism and its implications for the discontinuation of our representative form of government and accountability to the taxpayers. Under the “partnership” process, determining responsibility when something goes wrong is like pinning jello to the wall. Such a change in government, if presented in clear language to citizens at the polls, would be rejected. However, when implemented gradually, using the Marxist-Hegelian Dialectic, citizens don’t even notice what is happening. The shift is away from elected representatives.
In time, after voters have become even more disenchanted with the candidates and election results, fewer and fewer citizens will vote. At that point a highly-respected member of the public will enter the picture to propose a solution to the problem: some sort of compromise toward parliamentary form of government found in socialist democracies which will be acceptable to Americans unfamiliar with the protections guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution.
One says to oneself, confidently, “This will never happen.” Look around you. What do you see? Site-based management in your local schools, transferring decision-making, traditionally exercised by elected school boards, to politically correct appointees and the creation of unelected task forces at all government levels; proposals to “separate school and state”which make no mention of governmental and social structure consequences—efforts to have government money (taxes) pay for services delivered by private religious or home schools, etc., with no public representation. There can be no accountability to the taxpayers under a system so alien to the United States’ form of representative government.
How clean, neat and tidy. Wholesale destruction of an entire, wonderful system of government without firing a shot.